Calculating Rate of Change in Parallel Resistors

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rate of change of total resistance in parallel resistors R1 and R2, given their rates of increase. The user initially miscalculated the total resistance and the application of the derivative formula. A key correction highlighted is that the total resistance R should be 22.5 ohms, not 1/22.5. The correct derivative equation should be used to solve for dr/dt, leading to the accurate answer of 11/1600 or 0.006 ohm/sec. Clarifying these steps is essential for correctly solving related rates problems involving resistors.
tangents
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys, I learning about Related rates and although I understand the basic concepts, I'm stuggling with this problem

- When two resistors r1 and R2 are connected in parallel, the total resistance R is given by the equation 1/R=1/R1+1/R2. If R1 and R2 are increasing at rates of .01 ohm/sec and .02 ohm/sec respectively, at what rate is R changing at the instant R1=30 ohms and R2= 90 ohms?

My Work:

dr1/dt= .01
dr2/dt= .02
dr/dt= Trying to find this when r1=30 and r2=90
First what I did was plug in R1 and R2 to get total resistance which i got to be 1/22.5. Next I took the derivative of that equation: -1/r1²(dr/dt)=-1/r²(dr1/dt)-1/r²2(dr/dt). I plugged in R1 and R2 along with dr1/dt and dr2/dt along with the total resistance and tried to solve for dr/dt (total resistance change). But I end up with .018 ohms/sec whereas the answer the book shows is 11/1600 or .006 ohm/sec.

Where did i go wrong? Could someone please show me a easy to follow step by step in getting the answer ^_^, i would greatly appreciate it!.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tangents said:
-1/r1²(dr/dt)=-1/r²(dr1/dt)-1/r²2(dr/dt).
Don't you mean:
\frac{-1}{R^2}\frac{dR}{dt}=\frac{-1}{R_1^2}\frac{dR_1}{dt} - \frac{1}{R_2^2}\frac{dR_2}{dt}
Then its just a matter of solving for dr/dt:
\frac{dR}{dt}=-R^2(\frac{-1}{R_1^2}\frac{dR_1}{dt} - \frac{1}{R_2^2}\frac{dR_2}{dt})
You can get the value of R from the first equation. The answer comes out right.
 
tangents said:
First what I did was plug in R1 and R2 to get total resistance which i got to be 1/22.5.
I didn't see this before. This is a mistake. The formula gives you 1/R, so R is actually 22.5, not 1/22.5.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K