Calculating Reaction Force: Box on Rigid Wall with Applied Force of 100 N

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spectrum123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the reaction force exerted by a rigid wall on a box subjected to a horizontal force of 100 N. The box is in equilibrium, meaning the sum of horizontal forces equals zero. The reaction force from the wall can be determined using the equation F1 = Ff + F2, where Ff represents the frictional force and F2 is the wall's reaction force. The frictional force is defined as μN, where N is the normal force equal to the weight of the box, and the actual friction can vary from 0 to its maximum value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium in physics
  • Knowledge of friction coefficients (μ) and their implications
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic concepts of force and mass distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static and kinetic friction in detail
  • Learn how to apply Newton's laws to solve equilibrium problems
  • Explore the effects of mass distribution on force calculations
  • Investigate real-world applications of reaction forces in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, engineers dealing with structural mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding forces in static systems.

spectrum123
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Imagine a box of mass "M" lying on a surface and attached to a rigid wall too. Assuming that the co-efficient of friction between them(box and surface of ground) is "μ". and I am applying a force of 100 N horizontally on the box. So my question is how mush force is being applied by the wall on the box as a reaction force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You push towards the wall? There are multiple solutions, and it will depend on the geometry of your setup (where do you apply the force, how does the mass distribution of the box look like, and so on).
 


spectrum123 said:
Imagine a box of mass "M" lying on a surface and attached to a rigid wall too. Assuming that the co-efficient of friction between them(box and surface of ground) is "μ". and I am applying a force of 100 N horizontally on the box. So my question is how mush force is being applied by the wall on the box as a reaction force.

I don't quite follow you, since in the end you are not so interested in the friction but rather the force the wall exerts?

Anyway, I will try to answer with what I understand. Please clarify if this is not what you meant. The box is not moving, so it is in equilibrium. Considering all the forces in the horizontal direction, you get:

F_{1}=F_{f}+F_{2}
where F_{1} is the force you exert and F_{2} is the force the wall exerts. Note: Above F only concerns the magnitude, so we are ignoring direction for now.

You know Friction is μN and N has the same value as the weight (not mass) of the box. And F1 is 100N. So you just simply subtract the magnitude of the friction from 100N. That's the value of the force exerted by the wall.
 


Byron Chen said:
You know Friction is μN and N has the same value as the weight (not mass) of the box.
Realize that μN is the maximum possible value of static friction between the surfaces. The actual value can range from 0 to that maximum. As mfb says, there is not enough information to get a single answer.
 


Doc Al said:
Realize that μN is the maximum possible value of static friction between the surfaces. The actual value can range from 0 to that maximum. As mfb says, there is not enough information to get a single answer.

Good point I almost forgot. Guess I'm too used to problems dealing with kinetic friction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K