Calculating Reactions (Equations and Moments)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JMxBelfast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments Reactions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating reactions at supports A and B in a static equilibrium scenario. Participants emphasize the necessity of forming an equation based on vertical force equilibrium, which requires summing all vertical forces and setting them equal to zero. The second step involves taking moments about point A to determine the reaction at B, followed by substituting this value back into the equilibrium equation to find the reaction at A. Key equations referenced include the moment equation (moment = force x distance) and the principle of torque equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Knowledge of moment calculations in mechanics
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Ability to analyze forces and torques in a beam system
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of static equilibrium in mechanics
  • Learn how to calculate moments about different points in a beam
  • Explore the application of Newton's laws to static systems
  • Investigate the effects of distributed loads on beam reactions
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering mechanics, civil engineering, and anyone involved in structural analysis or static systems will benefit from this discussion.

JMxBelfast
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Need help at "Forming an equation based on the fact that all the vertical forces must be in equilibrium". I'm to calculate the reactions at the supports A and B by doing:

(i) Forming an equation based on the fact that all the vertical forces must be in equilibrium
(ii) Taking moments about A to find the reaction at B
(iii) Using your value for the reaction at B in the equation formed in part (i) to find the reaction at A

fUmPiEq.png


Homework Equations


I thought that the equation that I need to form would have been an equation for finding moments,
moment = force x distance.

The Attempt at a Solution


For part (i) I done:
M = (-30 x 0.5) + (-25 x 2.5)
= -77.5

It states that they are in equilibrium so does that mean I need to add '(30 x 0.5) + (25 x 2.5)' to the equation so that it become an equilibrium? Or is what I'm doing for part (i) actually what I should be doing for part (ii) as I need to take moments for that section of the question? If so then what equation must I form for part (i)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part (i), I believe, is simply summing all of the vertical forces and setting equal to 0. In other words, the sum of forces up is equal to the sum of forces down.

Part (ii), I believe, involves taking the sum of moments about point A (one of those moments being the upward force at point B) and setting them equal to 0. Or, as I prefer to think about it, the sum of CW torques is equal to the sum of CCW torques.

What I didn't understand is what that 1.25 kN/m is referring to. Also, I didn't see a weight for the tool that is laying on the two supports.

And yes, moment = force x distance.
 
Hmmm. It's hard not to just give the answer. Ok, you say you expected to be thinking about moments. That is one thing to think about, and you know the rotational form of Newton's law

Sum of torques = rotational Inertia x angular acceleration

Since the beam isn't spinning. Sum of torques = 0 about any axis you care to pick. That may come in handy at some point.

However, the beam also isn't moving, isn't accelerating. Do you know some similar facts for linear motion?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K