Calculating Solution to Sketch: Help Needed

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter liquidFuzz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the timing of signals exchanged between two persons, one stationary and one traveling at 0.6c. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects, particularly time dilation and the Relativistic Doppler effect, in determining when each person receives the signal. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and application of special relativity concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant sketches a solution involving time dilation, calculating that the stationary person receives the signal at 120s and the moving person at 150s.
  • Another participant argues that both persons will receive the signal at the same time according to their own clocks, suggesting an application of the Relativistic Doppler effect that results in a total time of two minutes for both.
  • Several participants emphasize the symmetry in the problem, noting that each person's frame of reference leads to the same conclusion about the timing of the signals, regardless of who is stationary or moving.
  • One participant points out that the moving person experiences time dilation, which affects their measurement of the signal reception from the stationary person.
  • Another participant suggests that the analysis could be extended to a frame of reference where both individuals are moving away from a common starting point, maintaining symmetry in time dilation effects.
  • A participant acknowledges the importance of defining the reference frame clearly and expresses a need for further understanding of the implications of the Relativistic Doppler effect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the timing of signal reception, with some asserting that both persons measure the same time while others maintain that the initial calculations may not account for relativistic effects properly. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact timing as perceived by each individual.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the reference frames and the application of relativistic principles, particularly concerning time dilation and the Doppler effect. The calculations presented are contingent upon these assumptions and the definitions of the reference frames used.

liquidFuzz
Messages
107
Reaction score
6
I would like to get some help on how to calculate a solution, I was only able to sketch a solution.

Suppose there's two persons. One person in traveling at 0.6c and one is at fixed position. They agree to signal after 1min.

I could only come up with a solution sketching a diagram. First [itex]t_v = \gamma t = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}= 75s[/itex]

My diagram gave me.
Fixed person gets signal at 120s.
Moving person gets signal at 150s.

I think it's right, but I like to calculate it in a proper way. If anyone could nudge me in the right direction...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If they both agree to send the signal after one minute according to their own clock traveling with them (how else could they do it?), then they both will receive the signal from the other person at the same time (according to their own clock).

This is an application of Relativistic Doppler which yields an answer of two minutes. So both would get the same answer that you got for the first person.

I think you may be overlooking the fact that the traveler measures the reception of the signal from the stationary person with his time dilated clock (just like he sends it according to his time dilated clock) and so he sees 120 seconds on his clock when the signal is received.
 
There is a symmetry that is being overlooked. If person A is stationary and B is moving at .6c, then the problem is being described in A's reference frame. However, in B's reference frame, B is stationary, while A is moving at .6c. Therefore in their own frames A and B must get the same answer.
 
mathman said:
There is a symmetry that is being overlooked. If person A is stationary and B is moving at .6c, then the problem is being described in A's reference frame. However, in B's reference frame, B is stationary, while A is moving at .6c. Therefore in their own frames A and B must get the same answer.

Nicely put.
 
mathman said:
There is a symmetry that is being overlooked. If person A is stationary and B is moving at .6c, then the problem is being described in A's reference frame. However, in B's reference frame, B is stationary, while A is moving at .6c. Therefore in their own frames A and B must get the same answer.
It doesn't matter which frame the problem is being described in, they both will get the same answer, as long as you do the analysis correctly, in this case, realizing that only the traveler is experiencing time dilation. The OP apparently was aware of this when calculating the delayed reaction of the traveler sending the signal back to the stationary person, but overlooked this when calculating the traveler's measurement of the stationary person's signal.

And you don't have to limit the analysis to a frame of reference in which one of the people is at rest. For example, you could pick a FoR in which both people travel in opposite directions from a common starting point. This would be the ultimate in symmetry because both would be experiencing the same time dilation, but a correct analysis will show again that they both will measure two minutes from the time they depart until they see the signal from the other person.
 
Last edited:
Well, thanks for the vigorous explanation of the different reference systems in this case. My idea was that the reference system would be the stationary. I should have mention that.
 
liquidFuzz said:
Well, thanks for the vigorous explanation of the different reference systems in this case. My idea was that the reference system would be the stationary. I should have mention that.
In Special Relativity, we consider every inertial Frame of Reference to be stationary and define the positions and motions of all the observers and objects with respect to that FoR. You stated that the first person was "fixed" and the second person was "moving" with respect to the assumed stationary FoR. That was very clear. You didn't need to mention anything else.

Do you now understand why the moving person also measures 120s?

Have you looked up Relativistic Doppler to see how that confirms your analysis?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K