Calculating Spectral Weight of a Gaussian Curve

vatlychatran
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Can you tell me what spectral weight is? If I have a spectrum that I measure, how can I get spectral weight? For simplicity, assume that the spectrum is a Gaussian curve. Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vatlychatran said:
Can you tell me what spectral weight is? If I have a spectrum that I measure, how can I get spectral weight? For simplicity, assume that the spectrum is a Gaussian curve. Thank you so much!

It's a little hard to tell without more context, but it PROBABLY refers to the relative intensity of a band, relative to the summed total intensity of the spectrum.
 
SpectraCat said:
It's a little hard to tell without more context, but it PROBABLY refers to the relative intensity of a band, relative to the summed total intensity of the spectrum.

Now I understand that spectral weight of a spectrum is area under the spectral curve.
 
How about telling us what type of spectrum are you looking at?

Please present as detailed and complete of a scenario as possible. If not, we'll be spending time just trying to figure out what you are asking, such as right now.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
How about telling us what type of spectrum are you looking at?

Please present as detailed and complete of a scenario as possible. If not, we'll be spending time just trying to figure out what you are asking, such as right now.

Zz.

I'm studying in superconductivity and measure Raman spectra. In fact, a detailed spectrum is not so necessary therefore as above I take a simple theoretical curve (Gaussian) to understand what spectral weight is. From papers I realize that spectral weight is area under the curve (area between curve and x axis). I can give you a spectrum but that is really not necessary. You can draw an arbitrary curve in xOy as you like and that is a spectrum.

Uhmmm. I should show you an example.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 1,065
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top