Calculating Speed of MRO Orbiting Mars

  • Thread starter Thread starter 462chevelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Speed
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) in its orbit around Mars. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect speed of approximately 27 km/s, while the correct speed is around 3.5 km/s. Participants emphasized the importance of using the correct equations and understanding the relationship between centripetal force and gravitational force. A key mistake was identified in the use of units, particularly converting kilometers to meters. After correcting the units and applying the right formula, the calculations aligned with the expected result.
462chevelle
Gold Member
Messages
305
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement



what is the speed of MRO in its orbit around mars.
M mars=6.4X10^23
m MRO=907 Kg
d between the two=200 km
R of mars=3400 km
G=6.7X10^-11

Homework Equations


D=(mMG)/r^2=(mV^2)/R=(MG/R)^1/2



The Attempt at a Solution


I attached a pic of some of my work. if I need to add more detail or its hard to read let me know. I am just curious where the mistake is.
thanks
Lonnie
 

Attachments

  • orbital motion problem.jpg
    orbital motion problem.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
to clarify since I noticed its hard to interpret. the answer I got was appx 27 km/s and the correct answer is 3.5km/s
thanks
Lonnie
 
462chevelle said:
to clarify since I noticed its hard to interpret. the answer I got was appx 27 km/s and the correct answer is 3.5km/s
thanks
Lonnie

You are certainly right that I can't interpret that. Hence I have no idea how you got 27km/s instead of the correct answer. Can you explain clearly how you got 27km/s?
 
if I use D=mV^2/R
I get 200km = (907(V^2))/3400
multiply 3400*200 then divide by 907
to get 749=V^2
then (749)^1/2=appx. 27
that's the only equation from lecture that has velocity in it is the reason I am using it. I would think I would need to use an equation with G or M in it. but I don't have one written down here
 
462chevelle said:
if I use D=mV^2/R
I get 200km = (907(V^2))/3400
multiply 3400*200 then divide by 907
to get 749=V^2
then (749)^1/2=appx. 27
that's the only equation from lecture that has velocity in it is the reason I am using it. I would think I would need to use an equation with G or M in it. but I don't have one written down here

You don't understand what your equations mean. mV^2/R is the centripetal force exerted on the satellite by its rotation around the planet. It's not equal the distance from the planet. R is the distance to the center of the planet from the satellite, I hope you know what the rest mean. Now GMm/R^2 is the gravitational force. If the satellite is in a stable circular orbit then the two forces are equal. Set them equal and solve for V.
 
Last edited:
youre correct. I wasn't understanding what I was doing. I guess I just started plugging stuff out of frustration.
I started over and set them equal to each other like so
mV^2/R=GMm/R^2
factored out useless variables and rewrote as
V=(GM/r)^1/2
solved It again and got crap numbers again. I think I need to get some sleep and try it tomorrow with a clear mind. I know I am doing something wrong that is very simple. I have to be. because in order to get 3.5 as velocity I will have to get somewhere around 12 as my answer inside of the parenthesis and that seems impossible with my lack of sleep or focus right now.
 
462chevelle said:
youre correct. I wasn't understanding what I was doing. I guess I just started plugging stuff out of frustration.
I started over and set them equal to each other like so
mV^2/R=GMm/R^2
factored out useless variables and rewrote as
V=(GM/r)^1/2
solved It again and got crap numbers again. I think I need to get some sleep and try it tomorrow with a clear mind. I know I am doing something wrong that is very simple. I have to be. because in order to get 3.5 as velocity I will have to get somewhere around 12 as my answer inside of the parenthesis and that seems impossible with my lack of sleep or focus right now.

Yes, try it again. Now you've got the right formula, but keep units in mind. G is probably given in units of meters, put everything in the same units and expect to get ~3500 m/s as your answer.
 
ahh crap.. i think you're right. i always screw up the units. after class ill have another stab at it and let you know how it goes.
thanks
 
the only way i can get it to work out right is if i convert
6.7X10^-11 to 6.7X10^-20
and i figured that out by leaving G as a variable and plugging 3.5 into v and solving for G
i wouldn't think that i would have to move my units as far as 9 places. but as many values are in the constant g its hard for me to interpret how to convert it
my lesson says G=6.7X10^-11m^3kg^-1s^-2
i guess i should understand what all of those units are interpreted as.
 
  • #10
462chevelle said:
the only way i can get it to work out right is if i convert
6.7X10^-11 to 6.7X10^-20
and i figured that out by leaving G as a variable and plugging 3.5 into v and solving for G
i wouldn't think that i would have to move my units as far as 9 places. but as many values are in the constant g its hard for me to interpret how to convert it
my lesson says G=6.7X10^-11m^3kg^-1s^-2
i guess i should understand what all of those units are interpreted as.

The units on G and M are fine! kg,m,s. The only ones that aren't fine are 200km and 3400km. Just change those to meters.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #11
awesome. that worked out perfect. thanks man. i would have to say units is something that messes me up a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
3K