Calculating Static Friction Coefficient w/ Angle of Uniform Slip

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the coefficient of static friction (μs) using the angle of uniform slip (θ). It clarifies that the correct relationship is tanθ = μs, contrasting it with the kinetic friction equation tanθ = μk. Participants express gratitude for the clarification, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between the angles for static and kinetic friction. The conversation highlights a common confusion in understanding friction coefficients. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
tratata
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How do you use the angle of uniform slip to calculate the coefficient of static friction?
Is there an equation for this? I cannot find it in the module on friction provided with the course... thanks!

I found somewhere that tanθ=μk, but that doesn't really help me, as i am looking for μs! thanks :)

PS sorry if this is a really stupid question by the way...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi tratata! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
tratata said:
How do you use the angle of uniform slip to calculate the coefficient of static friction?

I found somewhere that tanθ=μk, but that doesn't really help me, as i am looking for μs!

it's tanθ = μs (different θ, of course!), and for the same reason

i suppose you can prove why? :wink:
 


Thank you so very much tiny-tim! I really appreciate your help with this! It makes sense now when you pointed out the difference in angle!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
7K