How can the formula for calculating striking force be determined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iron Dove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
Calculating "striking force" involves more than just the basic formula of force (mass times acceleration); factors such as time of contact, density of contact areas, and the hardness of the striking object also play crucial roles. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding pressure and stress in solid impacts, suggesting that the formula might relate to force over area (P = ma/A). The complexity arises from the dynamics of how fighters push against the ground during strikes, making the problem nontrivial. Additionally, concepts like impulse and energy transfer, particularly in relation to area, are considered essential for accurately defining the impact force. Overall, the challenge lies in integrating various physical principles to achieve a comprehensive understanding of striking force.
Iron Dove
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
calculating "striking force"

Hi i am trying to find the formula for calculating "striking force" (IE punching/kicking). most of the formulas i have come across don't really seem to include all of the factors involved and are typically simply definitions of force (mass)(acceleration). In my mind it seems it may be related to "impact force" and "pressure" rather than just force (although pressure as i have been reading often only pertains to fluids). To me the factors not only include, mass, acceleration, time of contact, but also the density of the contact areas involved. is there anyone more educated in physics that can help me understand this? thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you need to look into "collisions" and momentum and stuff along those lines.
 


Not really about momentum here.
You find pressure in fluids context because for solids the word "stress" is used instead.
For kicking and punching it is hard because the fighters are pushing on the ground during the strike, which is why this is a nontrivial problem to solve.
 


I'm pretty sure this is best described by force over area or something like that.

So P = ma/A.
And your bones would break depending on a certain pressure threshold.

But then I think that impulse, or force x time, must come in here somehow, because if the object wasn't locked into place, the punch would be weak. But then again, you could apply a force of 1 N for 10 years and not break a board. Too confusing. It has too many factors. For example:

The hardness of the object applying the force is described by ΔF / t. In a force vs time graph, a hard object applies a steep force increase, while a more soft, elastic object applies a less steep parabola-looking spike.

I'm convinced that this problem CAN be accurately defined by force equations, and I don't think you need to use energy, unless you could do something like

Transferred Kinetic Energy / Area

mv2/2A
or such.


I'm very interested in what other people come up with. I've also tried looking up stuff on collisions, but all I could find were momentum stuff.

But then again, we could use mv/A. Worth a thought.
 


The amount of damage is the amount of energy that is absorbed and dissipated the the receiving body. Of course, the more localized the more intense it is in that area.
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K