Calculating Tension in a Rigid Beam Supported by Three Vertical Rods

  • Thread starter Thread starter aznboywunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in three vertical rods supporting a rigid beam under a specific load configuration. Participants explore various approaches to solve the problem, which involves concepts of static equilibrium and load distribution among the supports.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster questions whether bars 2 and 3 each carry 3000 lbs, indicating uncertainty about the load distribution.
  • One participant asserts that the problem is statically indeterminate and explains that the right support carries a larger share of the load, while the left carries the least.
  • Another participant proposes an alternative approach by 'moving' the load to the center and calculating moments, suggesting that the central load is shared equally among the three bars.
  • This alternative approach leads to a proposed load distribution of 500 lbs on the left support, 2000 lbs on the middle support, and 3500 lbs on the right support.
  • There is a reminder to avoid doing the original poster's work for them, emphasizing the importance of providing hints rather than complete solutions.
  • A participant requests clarification on a specific calculation related to the alternative approach, indicating a need for further explanation of the method used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the load distribution and methods for solving the problem. While some agree with the initial assessment of the load distribution, others propose alternative methods, leading to multiple competing views without a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the problem, including the need to consider the geometry of the beam rotation and the relationships between rod deflections. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the load distribution that remain open to interpretation.

aznboywunder
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rigid weightless horizontal 5ft long beam is supported by three vertical tension rods. Two of the rods are at the ends of the beam, the third one is in the middle. The beam has a 6000lb load which is applied halfway between the center and the right end. Calculate the tension in each bar. All bars are 6ft long and .375" diameter and are made of steel.



The Attempt at a Solution


I've been on this for an hour now and can't seem to figure out an answer. Is it true that bar 2 and 3 are carrying 3000lbs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aznboywunder said:

Homework Statement


A rigid weightless horizontal 5ft long beam is supported by three vertical tension rods. Two of the rods are at the ends of the beam, the third one is in the middle. The beam has a 6000lb load which is applied halfway between the center and the right end. Calculate the tension in each bar. All bars are 6ft long and .375" diameter and are made of steel.



The Attempt at a Solution


I've been on this for an hour now and can't seem to figure out an answer. Is it true that bar 2 and 3 are carrying 3000lbs?
No, that is not correct. This is an example of a rigid beam on elastic supports; the beam can rotate but not deform, and the tension rod supports may be considered as elastic springs. If the middle and right supports each carried 3000 lbs, then the left support would carry no load, which would violate the geometry of the rigid beam rotation.
This is a statically indeterminate problem. You must solve it accordingly, and note the geometry of the beam rotation and corresponding relationship of the rod deflections. The right support carries the larger share of the 6000 pound load, while the left support carries the least share of the load. The middle support carries one half the sum of the left and right support reactions.
 
I agree with Jay, but there is an alternative approach in this case, which is to 'move' the load to the centre, but also add a moment of 6000 x 1.25. The central load is then shared equally between the three bars, (2000 each) and the outer ones take the moment (6000x1.25/5 = 1500). Then add up the effects separately. Left side is 2000-1500= 500 middle is 2000 right end is 2000 + 1500 = 3500. This appoach is possible because the three rods are the same cross-section.
 
pongo38 said:
I agree with Jay, but there is an alternative approach in this case, which is to 'move' the load to the centre, but also add a moment of 6000 x 1.25. The central load is then shared equally between the three bars, (2000 each) and the outer ones take the moment (6000x1.25/5 = 1500). Then add up the effects separately. Left side is 2000-1500= 500 middle is 2000 right end is 2000 + 1500 = 3500. This appoach is possible because the three rods are the same cross-section.
Yes, that does make the calculation a lot easier by using the equivalent force -couple at mid-span approach.
 
pongo38 said:
I agree with Jay, but there is an alternative approach in this case, which is to 'move' the load to the centre, but also add a moment of 6000 x 1.25. The central load is then shared equally between the three bars, (2000 each) and the outer ones take the moment (6000x1.25/5 = 1500). Then add up the effects separately. Left side is 2000-1500= 500 middle is 2000 right end is 2000 + 1500 = 3500. This appoach is possible because the three rods are the same cross-section.

Please be careful not to do the original poster's (OP's) work for them. We are here to provide tutorial hints, and to find mistakes in their posted work. Please do not work out the equations for them.
 
Hi. For your alternative solution, you wrote that "the outer ones take the moment (6000x1.25/5 = 1500). Then add up the effects separately." I don't get the calculation part. Can you explain how you came up with this calculation?(6000x1.25/5)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K