Calculating the fall of the moon in one second

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silversonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Moon
Click For Summary
To calculate the moon's fall in one second, knowing its orbital circumference and a 29-day orbit, one must consider the geometry of its trajectory. The assumption that the moon's tangential path and vertical gravitational displacement intersect at the moon's actual orbit is valid for short time intervals, like one second. However, the accuracy of this assumption depends on the required precision; for estimates within 1%, it may be necessary to avoid simplifications. The arc traversed in one second is small enough to be approximated as a straight line, allowing for simplified calculations. Additionally, using the moon's sidereal orbit time instead of the synodic time can yield more accurate results.
Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If I know only the circumference of the orbit of the moon, and the time it takes to make an orbit (29 days), how far does the moon fall in one second?

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm failing to understand how certain assumptions can be made in the geometry here. From Figure 1 of this link;

http://www.michaelbeeson.com/interests/GreatMoments/Newton.pdf

It appears that the straight line the moon's tangential trajectory x, plus the vertical displacement by gravity s would meet at the exact path of the Moon's actual orbit in one second, point B. Normally this wouldn't be the case, but I guess it's indicating it's okay to make this assumption because we're only talking about 1 second of a 29-day orbit. But then again, how can I be sure this assumption won't affect my end result, considering my end result is also going to be VERY small (1/20 of an inch)? It seems like it should only be okay to make this assumption, about the perpendicularity, as long what I was calculating wasn't also very small.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose that depends on the accuracy you require on your small estimate. If you want a tolerance within 1% of you estimate, i.e. .05 +/- .0005, then maybe you should not make the assumption. However, for most practical purposes, and looking at the precision of the other constants used in the calculation, you should be fine with this simplification.

Also, you can look at the portion of the arc traversed in the time, 1sec is 2pi/2505600 radians of the orbit. This should be small enough to treat this section of the arc as a straight line.
 
You might want to look at the moons sidereal orbit time (about 27.3 days), not the synodic time as you have, also don't forget the Earth and moon orbit each other around a common point (barycentre)
 
Heres the word data sheet on two body systems attached
 

Attachments

The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K