Calculating the force due to friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the force due to friction in a scenario involving a man and a sled. Participants explore concepts related to momentum, forces, and the assumptions necessary for solving the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of momentum to find the initial velocity of the man and sled system. There are questions about the implications of assuming constant force and the distinction between average force and work done.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the use of momentum and the importance of clarifying assumptions regarding force. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these assumptions, particularly regarding the nature of frictional force.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern about the lack of explicit information regarding whether the force is constant and how this affects the calculations. Participants also mention the variability of coefficients of friction across surfaces.

Zero
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A man (mass is 90.0 kg, 7.00 m/s east) runs towards a sled (mass is 100.0 kg, initially stationary) and jumps on to it (assume momentum is conserved). The sled (with the Agent on top of it) slides a total distance of 4.00 meters. Assume the sled only moves horizontally. Calculate the force due to friction acting on the sled.
Relevant Equations
So I know the formula for friction is Ff= U (Fn) but I have the normal force but I don't have U. I know I can get U but for that I need acceleration. I know I can get acceleration but I need time. But without sounding redundant am I missing something???
p man= mv
p man = 90 (7)
p man= 630

p sled= mv
p sled= 100 (0)
p sled= 0

p man+sled= 630 + 0
p man+sled= 630

fg man= mg
fg man= 90 (9.8)
fg man= 882

fg sled= mg
fg sled= 100 (9.8)
fg sled= 980

fg sled+man= 980+882
fg sled+man= 1862
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-04-16 at 2.09.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-04-16 at 2.09.47 PM.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 185
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to calculate the initial velocity of the (man+sled) by using conservation of momentum. Since you then know the initial velocity and the distance traveled (two variables), you should be able to solve for the acceleration and the time (two variables).
 
phyzguy said:
You should be able to calculate the initial velocity of the (man+sled) by using conservation of momentum. Since you then know the initial velocity and the distance traveled (two variables), you should be able to solve for the acceleration and the time (two variables).
Thank you got what I was looking for really appreciate it.
 
Zero said:
Thank you got what I was looking for really appreciate it.
One quibble.. the question ought to have said to assume the force is constant. Some questions like this ask for average force instead of stating that, but that doesn’t work; for average force you would need to be told the time. Average force x distance does not necessarily equal work done.
 
haruspex said:
One quibble.. the question ought to have said to assume the force is constant. Some questions like this ask for average force instead of stating that, but that doesn’t work; for average force you would need to be told the time. Average force x distance does not necessarily equal work done.
It specifically says the force due to friction. The force due to friction depends only on the normal force, which doesn't change, so it should be constant.
 
phyzguy said:
It specifically says the force due to friction. The force due to friction depends only on the normal force, which doesn't change, so it should be constant.
Coefficients of friction vary, at least a bit, across a surface.
But my reason for intervening is to ensure the OP is not left with the erroneous understanding that energy/distance is a valid way to find average force. It is a widespread misconception.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K