Calculating the ionization rate in the Interstellar medium?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the ionization rate in the Interstellar Medium (ISM) using cosmic ray intensity data obtained from satellite observations. The key steps involve computing the energy in the material per unit thickness and dividing this by the average ionization potential. The discussion highlights the need to identify the appropriate material for energy computation in the ISM and clarifies that the ionization rate can be derived by dividing energy by ionization potential. Relevant resources, including articles on ISM ionization rates, are provided for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic ray intensity and flux measurements
  • Familiarity with ionization potential and its calculation
  • Knowledge of energy calculations in astrophysical contexts
  • Basic grasp of the Interstellar Medium (ISM) composition
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating cosmic ray intensity from satellite data
  • Learn about the average ionization potential of various materials in the ISM
  • Study the relationship between cosmic ray flux and reaction rates using cross-sections
  • Explore the provided articles on ISM ionization rates for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers in high energy astrophysics who are involved in cosmic ray studies and ionization processes in the Interstellar Medium.

unicornflyers
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I hope putting this in the high energy section is the right section (if not, please let me know which would be more appropriate!) I felt this was appropriate since the work I am doing is high energy astrophysics.

So I'm doing some research this summer, and my tasks were to take some data from satellite observations on cosmic rays, and find the Cosmic Ray intensity (sometimes referred to as flux, but is also known as the Cosmic ray spectrum) for several species. This includes protons, electrons, helium, and carbon.

The units on the intensity are $ [particles.m^{-2}.s^{-1}.sr^{-1}.(GeV/nuc^{-1}]$.

The next task is to find the ionization rate. Here is where I am confused.

I have these equations for intensity. I do not know how to get an ionization rate out of this. I know, in principle, what I should do to start, and that is the following:

1) compute the energy in the material per unit thickness
2) divide by the average ionization potentialBut here is my question. For the Interstellar Medium (ISM), what material are we considering to compute the energy? And how would we compute this per thickness?

Any time I have ever seen ionization potential, it was just looking it up on the periodic table. How do we actually go about computing the ionization potential?

Finally, to get the ionization rate, do we divide the energy by the ionization potential?

Thank you all!
 
unicornflyers said:
But here is my question. For the Interstellar Medium (ISM), what material are we considering to compute the energy? And how would we compute this per thickness?
One more or less answered that question earlier in the OP.
unicornflyers said:
some data from satellite observations on cosmic rays, and find the Cosmic Ray intensity (sometimes referred to as flux, but is also known as the Cosmic ray spectrum) for several species. This includes protons, electrons, helium, and carbon.

In addition to particles, one also has X-ray and gamma radiation. To get reaction rates, one would use the integrated product of the flux and the cross-section for the particular reaction.

Here is an article on ISM ionization rates with citations.
http://www.pnas.org/content/103/33/12269.full

See also - http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast871/Notes/Intro.pdf for some background
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 118 ·
4
Replies
118
Views
13K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K