Calculating the Magnetic Field in Free Space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field in free space given a specific electric field configuration. The electric field is described as a function of position and time, and participants are exploring the relationship between the electric and magnetic fields as dictated by Maxwell's equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the time derivative of the electric field and its implications for the magnetic field. There is an exploration of the directions in which the magnetic field can be perpendicular to the electric field, as well as the need to start with a general form of the magnetic field.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation of equations and the integration process, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement and relevant equations from electromagnetic theory. There are indications of confusion regarding the setup and calculations, particularly concerning the directions of the fields and the assumptions made about their relationships.

miew
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the electric field in free space is E=Eo(x^+y^)sin(2pi/lamda)(z+ct), with Eo=2 statvolts/cm the magnetic field, not including any static magnetic field, must be what?

2. Relevant equation

∇ x B= 1/c ∂E/∂t

The Attempt at a Solution



First I calculated ∂E/∂t= cE0/c (x^+y^)cos(2pi/lamba)(x+ct)

Since B is perpendicular to E, it just has a z^ direction.

∇xB=∂yBzx^-∂xBzj^.

Then I equal both equations and I got Bz=Boc(yx^-xj^) cos...

Is this right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume your hats mean unit vectors? So your E field is propagating in the z direction and the Field vector points in \hat x + \hat y?

You made some mistake when you calculated \partial E/\partial t. The argument inside the sine should not change and you get some additional factors.
You first guess for B is wrong. Z is not the only direction perpendicular to E.
 
Yes, they are unit vector. And the x inside the sin it is supposed to be a z, sorry :/

So aren't there two directions in which B can be perpendicular? x+z and y+z ?
 
There are two directions but in your first post you gave only one, z. And they are not the ones you gave in your last post.
In addition you only calculated B_z=..\hat x as proportional to a vector. But Bz should just be a number.

Unless you know from somewhere else that E and B are perpendicular, so far from the equations you don't see it. In this case you would have to start with a general B.
 
Okay, I start with a general B.

So then,
∂yBz-∂zBy= Eocos(A) (where A is everything after cos)
∂zBx-∂xBz= Eocos(A)
∂xBy=∂yBx=0

Is that right ? if it is, how do I solve it ?
 
Yes. The trick is to differentiate again and then combine the equations that you only have one B in the equation. Then you can integrate.
 
Differentiate with respect to what ? :/
 
x,y,z. You just have to find the right combination.
 
Okay, I am going to try that !

Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K