Calculating the resistance from R = pl/A

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsmith613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the resistance of a lead composed of multiple strands of copper wire, with specific dimensions and a given current. The resistivity of copper is provided, and the context suggests a focus on the relationship between resistance, length, and cross-sectional area.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula R = pl/A and its application to the problem, questioning the setup and calculations. There is confusion regarding the treatment of the strands in parallel and the correct interpretation of the area calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the resistance of multiple strands and the implications of their arrangement. There is recognition of errors in the initial calculations, and a few participants express understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings about the arrangement of strands and the corresponding effects on resistance. There is mention of specific values and references to external materials that may influence the discussion.

jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A laboratory lead consists of 16 strands of fine copper wire twisted together. Each strand is 30 cm long with a diameter of 0.15 mm. Calculate the potential difference across the lead when it is carrying a current of 2.0 A.
(The resistivity of copper = 1.7 × 10^-8 Ohm*m)

Homework Equations


What I would do is R = pl/A and then multiply by 2
BUT I can't find R

The Attempt at a Solution



(the answer is. apparently, 0.036 V but I can't see how)

I said R = [(1.7*10^-8)*16*0.3)/(pi*0.15/20000)^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I said R = [(1.7*10^-8)*16*0.3)/(pi*0.15/20000)^2)

Putting strands of wire in parallel decreases the total resistance, because the electrons now have many more paths to follow. 16 strands would decrease the resistance by a factor of 16.

Also, why are you dividing 0.15 by 20,000? Why is pi being squared? The area of a circle of pi*r^2, not (pi*r)^2.
 
ideasrule said:
Putting strands of wire in parallel decreases the total resistance, because the electrons now have many more paths to follow. 16 strands would decrease the resistance by a factor of 16.

Also, why are you dividing 0.15 by 20,000? Why is pi being squared? The area of a circle of pi*r^2, not (pi*r)^2.

er, sorry abou the pi^2 bad use of brackets

it was meant to be pi * (0.15/2000)^2

again sorry,

Question: it is still ONE strand of wire, just twisted, are you sure total R decreases
 
seems you are correct - I now get the correct answer
thanks
 
oh, don't worry I get it
first example 16 separate strands
second example one strand with 8 branches
its ok
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
18K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
12K