Calculating the Spring Constant from Force-Extension Graph

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant from a force-extension graph, utilizing a set of force and extension data points. Participants are exploring the relationship between the gradient of the graph and the spring constant, as described by Hooke's Law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss plotting data points and calculating the gradient to find the spring constant. There are questions about discrepancies between the calculated gradient and expected values, as well as concerns about the graph not intersecting at the origin.

Discussion Status

Some participants are sharing their attempts at plotting the data and calculating the gradient, while others are questioning the implications of their findings. There is a suggestion that starting from a different point on the graph may help address the discrepancies observed.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential errors due to the graph not intersecting at the origin and the possibility of using different starting points for calculations. There is also a reference to guidance from a teacher regarding the approach to the problem.

Jadaa
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Force Extension in (m)
1.0 0.014.
1.5 0.032.
2.0 0.053.
2.5 0.071.
3.0 0.090.
3.5 0.110.
4.0 0.130.
4.5 0.148.
5.0 0.166.

Homework Equations


RESULTS FROM GRAPH.
F= kx.
k=F/x,m= vertical side/ horizontal rise.

The Attempt at a Solution


I plotted a graph of force against extension and found the gradient to be 26.3N/m using the points (0.014,0.1) and (0.166,0.5).
It's my understanding that the gradient should be equal to the answer obtained from k= F/x but when I work it out the answers are not similar and I'm not sure where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jadaa said:
but when I work it out the answers are not similar
Can you explain what that means. Does that mean that your answer is significantly different than the book?
 
TomHart said:
Can you explain what that means. Does that mean that your answer is significantly different than the book?

When I work it out it's not equal to the gradient which my teacher says it should be. I think it's because I'm not sure how to probably use the formula when there are so many quantities.
 
I plotted the data. It appears that it doesn't intersect at x=0, F=0 very well. That has to be what is causing the discrepancy.
 
TomHart said:
I plotted the data. It appears that it doesn't intersect at x=0, F=0 very well. That has to be what is causing the discrepancy.

Ooo I see my teacher has advised us that we could have started from 0.5 F instead of 0 instead as we were getting errors. Thank you I'll try to recover my previous set of data.
 
That should help because if I find an equation for the line based on the 26.3 slope, it shows an offset of 0.63 N.
 
Thanks again
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TomHart

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K