Calculating the surface area of a solid of rotation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the surface area of a solid of revolution generated by the curve defined by the equation x^(3/2) + y^(3/2) = 1 when rotated around the x-axis. Participants are exploring the appropriate methods and formulas for this calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how to express the equation as a function of y(x) and whether the integral can be simplified. There are discussions about the bounds of integration and the correct formula for surface area versus volume. Some participants express uncertainty about the integrability of the function and the methods to approach the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various insights and suggestions. Some have pointed out the need for a complete problem statement and have raised questions about the integration process. There is a recognition of the complexity of the integral involved, and some participants are considering numerical solutions or alternative methods.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the participants' level of study, indicating that they are first-semester calculus students. This context may influence the approaches discussed and the expectations for the problem-solving process.

  • #31
NascentOxygen said:
W-alpha says the answer is a little over 4¼
Funny. I see 5.5 (also when I do it in Excel) ? And Wolfram gives no clue of anything analytic.

I sympathize with Wi_N -- this thing looks, and is, horrible. Perhaps we are overlooking something, as @Wi_N suspects in #21, but I for sure don't see it. All I can think of is the numerical solution, but that's not appropriate for calc 101. So my best guess is teacher (or the exercise composer) made a mistake somewhere.
Let us know how this goes !

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wi_N
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
BvU said:
Funny. I see 5.5 (also when I do it in Excel) ? And Wolfram gives no clue of anything analytic.

I sympathize with Wi_N -- this thing looks, and is, horrible. Perhaps we are overlooking something, as @Wi_N suspects in #21, but I for sure don't see it. All I can think of is the numerical solution, but that's not appropriate for calc 101. So my best guess is teacher (or the exercise composer) made a mistake somewhere.
Let us know how this goes !

##\ ##
thank you so much for your help. i get the answer tomorrow on friday. i will make sure to update you in this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and WWGD
  • #33
Update:
Showed my professor the problem he stared at it for a few minutes and said he would get back to me. The questions are automated so there is a chance i received a question that is not solvable. My professor is world famous (he has a wikipedia page) so I don't think its solvable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and BvU
  • #34
Was this problem solved finally? or is it not solvable?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K