Calculating the Top Accelerations of a Falling Chimney

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the accelerations of the top of a falling chimney, modeled as a thin rod. The chimney falls at an angle of 35 degrees with respect to the vertical, and participants are exploring the relationship between tangential and radial accelerations using energy considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of energy conservation and the implications of the angle on calculations. There are attempts to derive tangential velocity and questions about the relevance of time in the context of the problem. Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions of radial and tangential acceleration.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between different types of acceleration and velocity. Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the equations used, while others are questioning the appropriateness of certain approaches, such as the use of torque.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through trigonometric considerations and the implications of angular motion, with some uncertainty about the definitions and roles of radial and tangential components in the context of the problem.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


A tall,cylindrical chimney falls over when its base is ruptured.Treat the chimney as a thin rod of length ##55.0m##.At the instant its makes an angle of ##35.0^°## with the vertical as it falls,what are the (a) ##a_r## of the top ? (b) ##a_t## of the top ? (Hint:Use energy considerations,not a torque )

Homework Equations


##mgh=\frac 1 2Iw^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


##L=55m##
For tangential veloctiy I found ##\frac 1 2Mg(L-Lsin(35))=\frac 1 2(\frac 1 3ML^2)(\frac {(V_{tan})^2} {L^2})##

from that I get ##V_{tan}=26.27 \frac m s##

I stucked here... I thought ##\frac {V_{tan}} {rt}=∝##

##t## is the time that end point comes that angle.
but it didnt worked out.

##a_r=\frac {(v_r)^2} {r}## I don't know how to find radial velocity...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:
For tangential veloctiy I found ##\frac 1 2Mg(L-Lsin(35))=\frac 1 2(\frac 1 3ML^2)(\frac {(V_{tan})^2} {L^2})##
Check the trigonometry that you used to get the left side. (The 35o angle is measuresd from the vertical.)
I stucked here... I thought ##\frac {V_{tan}} {rt}=∝##

##t## is the time that end point comes that angle.
but it didnt worked out.
I don't understand your equation here. There is no need to worry about time in this problem.

##a_r=\frac {(v_r)^2} {r}## I don't know how to find radial velocity...
If a particle moves in a circle at constant speed, does it have any radial acceleration? Does it have any radial velocity? Thus, does your equation ##a_r=\frac {(v_r)^2} {r}## hold?
 
TSny said:
Check the trigonometry that you used to get the left side. (The 35o angle is measuresd from the vertical.)

sorry it will be cos35.
TSny said:
I don't understand your equation here. There is no need to worry about time in this problem.

its ##w-w_0=∝t##
TSny said:
If a particle moves in a circle at constant speed, does it have any radial acceleration? Does it have any radial velocity? Thus, does your equation ar=(vr)2rar=(vr)2ra_r=\frac {(v_r)^2} {r} hold?

I think velocity is a vector and as the rod moves , the velocity vector will change,thus, there will be some acceleration
 
Arman777 said:
sorry it will be cos35.
Yes.
I think velocity is a vector and as the rod moves , the velocity vector will change,thus, there will be some acceleration
Yes. If you review the basic formula for radial (or centripetal) acceleration of a particle moving in a circle, you will see that it does not involve radial velocity, it involves tangential velocity.
 
TSny said:
Yes.

Yes. If you review the basic formula for radial (or centripetal) acceleration of a particle moving in a circle, you will see that it does not involve radial velocity.

so its ##a_r=\frac {(v_t)^2} {r}## ??
 
Arman777 said:
so its ##a_r=\frac {(v_t)^2} {r}## ??
Yes, except be careful with signs (i.e., directions).
 
Ok I found ##a_r## correctly,what about ##a_t## ?
 
Arman777 said:
Ok I found ##a_r## correctly,what about ##a_t## ?
Despite the wording of the problem, I think using torque is the way to go here.
 
TSny said:
Despite the wording of the problem, I think using torque is the way to go here.

yep I found thanks again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
18K