Calculating the volume and lateral area of cones

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the volume and lateral area of cones using two different methods: summing disks and summing triangles. The correct volume of the cone, derived from the equation x^2 + y^2 = (9/4)z^2, is V = 3π/4 when using the disk method. In contrast, the triangle method yields an incorrect volume of 3π/2 due to a misunderstanding of the distance a triangle sweeps when rotated. The discrepancy arises from the variable distance from the z-axis, which affects the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with the geometric properties of cones.
  • Knowledge of polar coordinates and their application in integration.
  • Concept of volume calculation through cross-sectional areas.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of calculating volumes using integration of cross-sectional areas.
  • Explore the concept of polar coordinates in depth, particularly in relation to integration.
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of integrals in three-dimensional space.
  • Review common mistakes in volume calculations, particularly with variable distances in integration.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching geometry, and anyone interested in understanding the mathematical principles behind volume calculations of three-dimensional shapes.

TheBaker
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
This is probably just me being a bit of an idiot (I'm going to blame exam stress), but why do the following ways of calculating the volume and lateral area of cones produce different results?

I'll use the following equation of a cone to demonstrate:

x^2 + y^2 = \frac{9}{4}z^2 (Valid for 0 \leq z \leq 1)

Volume - Summing Disks

V = \int_0^1 \pi r^2 dz = \int_0^1 \frac{9\pi}{4}z^2 dz = \frac{3\pi}{4}

This is the correct answer. However, if instead of summing disks from bottom to top, I sum triangles around the cone...

Volume - Summing Triangles

A = \frac{1}{2} \mbox{base} \times \mbox{height} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{3}{2}

Then, integrating this around a circle to form a cone I get:

\int_0^{2\pi} \frac{3}{4} d\theta = \frac{3 \pi}{2}

This is twice as large as the (correct) volume found the other way, but conceptually I can't see where I've made a mistake. A similar thing happens for the surface area - when you sum the hypotenuse of the triangle or the circumference of the disks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distance through which a triangle "sweeps" when moved by an angle d\theta is not constant- in particular, it is not d\theta (which is not a distance to begin with). It varies with distance from the z-axis as r d\theta.
 
Ah, gotcha. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K