Calculating Theoretical Landé Factor for Dy_2O_3 and Er_2O_3

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuengb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theoretical
kuengb
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

I did an experiment about magnetic susceptibility of Dy_2O_3 and Er_2O_3. For data evaluation I have to calculate the theoretical Landé factor for the paramagnetic atoms in these salts which is defined as
g_j=1+\frac{j(j+1)+s(s+1)-l(l+1)}{2j(j+1)}
where l and s are the net quantum numbers for orbital momentum and electron spin respectively, j=l+s total angular momentum. The factor gives the relation between angular momentum and magnetic momentum.

The problem is: I don't completely understand how to find the correct values for l and s. That's how I understood it:

1)l is the sum of the l values for all electrons in non-filled orbitals, and s is the sum of the spin numbers (i.e. 1/2) of all unpaired electrons. For Erbium with configuration (Xe)4f^{12} 6s^2 this would then be:12 electrons in the 4f orbital, hence l=12*3, and two unpaired electrons in that orbital, i.e. s=2*1/2. Does this make sense?

2)In the crystal structure of Er_2O_3, Erbium gives away three elecrons to Oxygen. Is it then reasonable to take the electron configuration of Terbium, which is three numbers below, for the above calculation? If not, how do I have to deal with this ionic bindings?

Thanks
Bruno
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er3+ has 11 electrons in its 4f shell (3 holes). These are the only ones you need to consider.
 
Thank you. So, what I've written in 1) is correct, i.e. in this case l=11*3 and s=3/2 ?

Is there an easy way to understand why Er3+ has this particular configuration and not 4f9-6s2?

Regards
Bruno
 
kuengb said:
Is there an easy way to understand why Er3+ has this particular configuration and not 4f9-6s2?
No, that requires computer calculations. But it is what the rare Earth's do (similar to the transition metals).

Your result for the total l is wrong, because one needs to add orbital moments vectorially. It is easiest to add the l_z components of the 4f-holes, and then one can see that l = maximum l_z = 3 + 2 + 1.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Back
Top