Calculating Total Resistance Without Prefix

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
20 replies · 11K views
Angie K.
Messages
108
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



upload_2015-4-21_17-54-36.png


a. What is the net resistance of the circuit connected to the battery in the figure above? Each resistor has the same resistance R. Give your answer as a number times R

b. What is the net resistance if the diagonal resistor between nodes A and B is replaced by a resistance of 1.9 R?

Homework Equations


Combining Resistors

Resistors in Series:
R(eq)=R1+R2+R3...

Resistors in Parallel:
R(eq)=1/R1+1/R2+1/R3...

The Attempt at a Solution


I feel like I did everything right but my answer or 13R/7 is wrong.
I labeled the Resistors: starting from the left side of square, R1, then the top R2, diagonal resistor R3, bottom of square R4 and right side of square R5 and the bottom resistor R6 (maybe I didn't need to go through all that to label them but I feel like it would be easier to understand my attempt of solving this).

R1 and R2 are in series so adding them, I get 2R
Substituting R1 and R2 with a single 2R resistor, that one resistor would be in parallel to R3 so I get 3/2R
Then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in series to R5 so I got 5R/3
then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in parallel to R4 (bottom of square) so adding those, I got 6R/7 and adding the last resistor (in series) I got a total of 13R/7

Not sure where I went wrong, please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you combine 2R in parallel with R on your second line:

[tex]\frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{2R} + \frac{1}{R} = \frac{3}{2R}[/tex]
Then you have to flip it to get the reciprocal:
[tex]\frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{3}{2R} \implies R_{eq} = \frac{2R}{3}[/tex]
Don't forget to find that last reciprocal when finding the equivalent of two parallel resistors.

It helps to remember that, for two resistors in parallel (with a little algebra):
[tex]R_{eq} = \frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2}.[/tex]
 
Angie K. said:

Homework Statement



View attachment 82340

a. What is the net resistance of the circuit connected to the battery in the figure above? Each resistor has the same resistance R. Give your answer as a number times R

b. What is the net resistance if the diagonal resistor between nodes A and B is replaced by a resistance of 1.9 R?

Homework Equations


Combining Resistors

Resistors in Series:
R(eq)=R1+R2+R3...

Resistors in Parallel:
R(eq)=1/R1+1/R2+1/R3...

The Attempt at a Solution


I feel like I did everything right but my answer or 13R/7 is wrong.
I labeled the Resistors: starting from the left side of square, R1, then the top R2, diagonal resistor R3, bottom of square R4 and right side of square R5 and the bottom resistor R6 (maybe I didn't need to go through all that to label them but I feel like it would be easier to understand my attempt of solving this).

R1 and R2 are in series so adding them, I get 2R
Substituting R1 and R2 with a single 2R resistor, that one resistor would be in parallel to R3 so I get 3/2R
Then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in series to R5 so I got 5R/3
then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in parallel to R4 (bottom of square) so adding those, I got 6R/7 and adding the last resistor (in series) I got a total of 13R/7

Not sure where I went wrong, please help.
axmis has given you good information.

An additional point of information: If two resistors are in parallel, the equivalent resistance is less that the resistance of either one.

Your analysis of which resistor combinations are in parallel & which are in series is completely correct. That is usually what confuses people in these problems.
 
Angie K. said:
R1 and R2 are in series so adding them, I get 2R
Substituting R1 and R2 with a single 2R resistor, that one resistor would be in parallel to R3 so I get 3/2R (taking the reciprocal, I get 2R/3)
Then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in series to R5 so I got 5R/3
then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in parallel to R4 (bottom of square) so adding those, I got (7/6R and taking the reciprocal, it's 6R/7) and adding the last resistor (in series) I got a total of 13R/7
I made sure to take the reciprocal of the ones added in parallel but the answer is wrong.
 
Angie K. said:
Substituting R1 and R2 with a single 2R resistor, that one resistor would be in parallel to R3 so I get 3/2R
As noted, that should have been (2/3)R, but it looks like that was just a typo in the OP since the next one is right:
Angie K. said:
Then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in series to R5 so I got 5R/3
But the one after is wrong:
Angie K. said:
then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in parallel to R4 (bottom of square) so adding those, I got 6R/7
Try that again.
 
Angie K. said:
R1 and R2 are in series so adding them, I get 2R
Substituting R1 and R2 with a single 2R resistor, that one resistor would be in parallel to R3 so I get 3/2R
Then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in series to R5 so I got 5R/3
then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in parallel to R4 (bottom of square) so adding those, I got 6R/7 and adding the last resistor (in series) I got a total of 13R/7
I saw where I went wrong adding the R4 to 5R/3 so 1/(5R/3)+1/R gives me 16/15R and the reciprocal is 15R/16 then adding the last R to that, which is in series, I get 31R/16 which is also not right.
 
Angie K. said:
I saw where I went wrong adding the R4 to 5R/3 so 1/(5R/3)+1/R gives me 16/15R and the reciprocal is 15R/16 then adding the last R to that, which is in series, I get 31R/16 which is also not right.
Try 1/(5R/3)+1/R again.

It may be easier if you notice that 1/(5R/3) = 3/(5R)
 
I got 13/8 R and it's the right answer. Thank you all for helping me catch my mistakes!

Now for part b, would I just substitute 1.9 and add everything else the same?
 
Angie K. said:
Now for part b, would I just substitute 1.9 and add everything else the same?

I'm getting 46/29 R when I plug in 1.9R for R3 (sorry this was supposed to be R3) I just edited it.
 
Last edited:
The one that is on a diagonal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
The one on a diagonal is R3 at least that's what I attempted to say earlier.
 
Angie K. said:
R1 and R2 are in series so adding them, I get 2R
Substituting R1 and R2 with a single 2R resistor, that one resistor would be in parallel to R3 (which is now 1.9R) so I get 1/2R+1.9R = 12/5R and taking the reciprocal, it's 5/12R
Then substituting one resistor for those, that one would be in series to R5 so 5/12R+R=17/12R
then substituting one 17/12R resistor for those, that one would be in parallel to R4 (bottom of square) so adding 1/(17R/12R)+1/R= 12/17R and taking the reciprocal, it's 12/17R and then adding that to the last R (12/17R+R=and adding the last resistor (in series) I got a total of 29R/17 which is a different number than the first time I tried but it's still wrong.
 
Oh I didn't take the reciprocal of 1.9

I got my answer thanks!