Calculating Velocity of a Rock Dropped into a Hole Drilled Through the Earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the velocity of a rock dropped into a hole drilled through the Earth, where the force of gravity is said to be proportional to the distance from the center. Participants are exploring the implications of this setup and the resulting equations of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up differential equations to model the motion of the rock, questioning the correctness of their formulations and integrals. Some express uncertainty about their understanding of second-order differential equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants offering insights and corrections regarding the equations being used. There is a mix of approaches being considered, including energy conservation and differential equations, but no consensus has been reached on a single method.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the unrealistic nature of the assumptions, such as constant density throughout the Earth, and question the feasibility of drilling a hole through the Earth. There is acknowledgment of the complexities involved in the Earth's structure that may affect the problem's assumptions.

pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Inside the earth, the force of gravity is proportional to the distance from the center. If a hole is drilled through the Earth from pole to pole and a rock is dropped in the hole, with what velocity will it reach the center?

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the proper way to set it up is

\frac{ d^2 x}{dt^2} = C (R - x),

where R is the radius of the earth. Then, since the acceleration is ## g ## when the rock is at R, aka when x = 0, C must equal g / R. Thus, the equation is

\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} = \frac{ g}{R} (R-x)

Is this the correct way to proceed?

\int \frac{d^2 x}{g/R (R - x)} = \int dt^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
piercebeatz said:

Homework Statement



Inside the earth, the force of gravity is proportional to the distance from the center. If a hole is drilled through the Earth from pole to pole and a rock is dropped in the hole, with what velocity will it reach the center?

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the proper way to set it up is

\frac{ d^2 x}{dt^2} = C (R - x),
I would be inclined to let x be the distance from the center of the earth, with x = 0 being at the center and x = R being at the Earth's surface.

For a differential equation I would start with m x'' = Cx, which is a 2nd-order DE with constant coefficients. Presumably you have already worked some problems like this.
piercebeatz said:
where R is the radius of the earth. Then, since the acceleration is ## g ## when the rock is at R, aka when x = 0, C must equal g / R. Thus, the equation is

\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} = \frac{ g}{R} (R-x)

Is this the correct way to proceed?

\int \frac{d^2 x}{g/R (R - x)} = \int dt^2
No. Your integral is not correct.
 
Ok, so I have

\frac{ d^2 x}{dt^2} = \frac{g}{R} x

Can I do this?

\frac{ R}{g} \int \frac{ d^2 x}{x} = \int dt^2

Does that even make sense?

By the way, I haven't learned anything about second order d.e.'s yet
 
piercebeatz said:
Ok, so I have

\frac{ d^2 x}{dt^2} = \frac{g}{R} x

Can I do this?

\frac{ R}{g} \int \frac{ d^2 x}{x} = \int dt^2

Does that even make sense?
No, you can't do that, and it doesn't make sense.
piercebeatz said:
By the way, I haven't learned anything about second order d.e.'s yet
Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way, but I don't see any way around writing the equation as a 2nd order DE. I can't think of any trick to get it into the form of a 1st order DE.
 
Well, I don't need to solve it, I only need to find an expression for ## dx / dt ## since the problem is asking for the velocity at x = 0. Any ideas?
 
The DE could be written this way:
m dv/dt = kx, x(0) = R

or dv/dt = (k/m)x
If you integrate the left side, you get v, but the right side would have to be left as an integral, since you're integrating a function of t (i.e., x(t)) with respect to t.
 
piercebeatz said:
Ok, so I have

\frac{ d^2 x}{dt^2} = \frac{g}{R} x
You have a sign error. x is the distance from the centre of Earth, which decreases if the rock is falling down. The correct equation is \frac{ d^2 x}{dt^2} = -\frac{g}{R} x

The velocity v is the first time derivative of x, so d2x/dt2=dv/dt. You can consider v as function of x: v(x(t)). Whith the Chain Rule, dv/dt=dv/dx dx/dt = dv/dx v= 0.5 d(v2/dx). Your equation can be written as

\frac{ d(v^2)}{dx} = -\frac{g}{R} x.

that is a first order equation. Can you solve it for v2(x)?


ehild
 
Do you have to use a differential equation?
It is easier with energy conservation - ehild's last equation goes in the same direction.
 
Nice catch, ehild. (By the way, I was defining up as positive, so the g i was using had a self-contained negative, but you're right, using using -g works better here)

\frac{dx^2}{dt^2} = v \frac{ dv}{dx} = - \frac{g}{R} x

\int v \, dv = -\frac{ g}{R} \int x \, dx

v^2 /2 = - \frac{g}{R} x^2 /2 + C

Since v= 0 when x = R:

0 = - gR + 2C \implies C = gR /2

Plugging in x = 0:

v^2 = gR \implies v = \sqrt{gR}

Interesting, even though I'm pretty sure hollowing out the Earth would take away its gravitational properties.
 
  • #10
piercebeatz said:
Plugging in x = 0:

v^2 = gR \implies v = \sqrt{gR}
Correct.

This is an immediate consequence of conservation of energy -- assuming "the force of gravity is proportional to the distance from the center", that is. This isn't the case. That assumption requires a constant density throughout. The Earth's interior has anything but a constant density. The Earth's core is mostly iron and is highly compressed. Gravitational acceleration at the core/mantle boundary (about halfway down) is greater than acceleration at the surface of the Earth! That the Earth does not have a constant density has been known since 1774. Even though it's rather unrealistic, this constant density assumption makes for lots of interesting and fairly simple math/physics problems.

Interesting, even though I'm pretty sure hollowing out the Earth would take away its gravitational properties.
We're not hollowing out the Earth here. We're just making a hole through the Earth, presumably one with an insignificantly small diameter.
 
  • #11
D H said:
We're not hollowing out the Earth here. We're just making a hole through the Earth, presumably one with an insignificantly small diameter.

Good point, but I think that's also impossible
 
  • #12
Of course it's impossible. That's not the point of the exercise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K