Calculating Velocity of Particles with Given Energy in Special Relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of an electron and a positron, each with an energy of 50 GeV, using principles from special relativity. Participants explore the relationship between energy, momentum, and velocity in relativistic contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the equation E^2=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2 to find velocity but questions the algebraic manipulation. Other participants suggest finding the Lorentz factor and discuss the relationship between total energy and rest energy. There are inquiries about the derivation of certain equations and their applicability in this context.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, questioning assumptions about energy definitions, and clarifying the relationships between different energy forms. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the Lorentz factor and the distinction between total energy and kinetic energy, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretation of the equations.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding whether the 50 GeV refers to total energy or kinetic energy, and participants are considering the implications of this distinction. The discussion also touches on the significance of relativistic effects at high energies.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


If an electron and a Positron are said to each have 50GeV of energy (8E-9J) then how do I find their velocity? Do I use E^2=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2 and solve for velocity in the momentum? Is there an easier way to do this? I did this, I might have done the algebra wrong but I got an answer that was basically zero, lol. Any advice is nice :D


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find the Lorentz factor, gamma; you can invert this to find the velocity.

Since you have the total energy, E=50GeV note that this is the sum of the rest energy (E0=mc^2) plus the work done on the electron. This is equivalent to E/E0 = gamma - 1; this is the gamma that you need.
 
so E = E0gamma - E0...? Energy = (What is this term?) - Rest Energy? How did you derive this? Did you mean to put an addition sign there at all and then E0gamma would represent the kinetic energy or something? If E is the total energy this equation means E0gamma is greater than it, so what could it possibly be?

Also how is this equation related to
E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 ??
It looks like it's more related to the nonrelativistic approximation of
E = K + mc^2, which would mean it's wrong because I think I'm suppose to be using the actual relativistic equation for this problem.
 
Explanation: if E0=mc^2 is the rest energy then the total energy is gamma*E0. Then the kinetic energy is:

E_kinetic = gamma*E0 - E0. So (gamma-1) = E_kinetic/E0 which gives provides a value for the Lorentz factor.

You can derive this from E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy#Relativistic_kinetic_energy_of_rigid_bodies

Is the 50GeV the total energy, or the total energy? It could be either - but for an electron the kinetic energy is the work done on the electron - so if you have placed an electron in a 50 GV electric potential it will have 50 GeV when it reaches the other side; they actually do this in stages for such high energies. Anyway E0 for an electron or positron is about 0.511 MeV, so the difference is insignificant.

So (gamma-1)=50 GeV/0.511 MeV ~= ~100,000. This implies v=.999 c, where you will have to figure out how many nines! 20 keV gives ~c/4 and 30 keV gives ~c/3 which are the speeds I usually work with.
 
I thought E_kinetic = Gamma*E0 - E0 was only an approximation of E^2 = (pc)^2+(mc^2)^2 in nonrelativistic situations?? thanks btw :D
 
No, it is exact.
 
...however, this expression is on the usual route to deriving the Newtonian formula for kinetic energy. If you Taylor expand the gamma and disregard terms of order v4 and higher, out drops mv2/2. That is an approximation, and may be what you're thinking of.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K