Calculating Voltage Across a Capacitor in a RC Circuit with Two Resistors

ProjectENIS
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a circuit with two resistors, R and r, and a capacitor of C, and EMF of V0 as shown in the diagram, find the voltage across the capacitor during charging. Prove that this voltage, V is given by V = V0 (r/(R+r)) (1-e-((R+r)t)/(RrC))

Homework Equations



N.A.

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I have

Loop A (with C): V0 + RI + q/c = 0 ==> I = (V0 - VC)/R
Loop B (with r): V0 + RI + rIr = 0
I = Ir + Ic ==> I = V/r + C(dv/dt)

From first and third,
(V0 - VC)/R = V/r + C(dv/dt)

Simplify to get,
V0 - RC(dv/dt) = V(1+R/r)
V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - RC(dV/dt))

The shape of the equation is getting there (I hope), but what do I do next? To get the given equation, RC(dV/dt) must be V0e-((R+r)t)/(RrC).

RC (dV/dt) = V, solving this differential equation to get ln (V) = -t/(RC) + k, hence, RC (dV/dt) = e-t/(RC) + k. And I am totally stuck.

Did I do something wrong somewhere? I can't think of anyway to get the RrC term in e-((R+r)t)/(RrC), not to mention the V0 and the (R+r) terms, unless k is like Rt/r. But that still does not give me a V0?
 

Attachments

  • RC.png
    RC.png
    802 bytes · Views: 1,174
Physics news on Phys.org
The differential equation is correct. You need not solve it to prove that the given V is solution, just plug in V and dV/dt. What is the derivative of the given V(t) function? ehild
 
Hi ehild,

Thanks for your reply.

For the differential equation, V = RC (dV/dt), solved for V = e-t/(RC) + k,

e-t/(RC) + k = RC (dV/dt)

dV/dt = e-t/(RC) + k/RC

Is this what you meant?
 
Last edited:
ProjectENIS said:
Hi ehild,

Thanks for your reply.

For the differential equation, V = RC (dV/dt), solved for V = e-t/(RC) + k,

e-t/(RC) + k = RC (dV/dt)

dV/dt = e-t/(RC) + k/RC

Is this what you meant?

NO.

Your differential equation is not V = RC (dV/dt), but V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - RC(dV/dt)).


ehild
 
Sorry for the mistake,

That will get me

(V - (r/[R+r])V0)-1dV = [-(r/[R+r])RC)]-1dt

Which gets me ln [V - (r/[R+r])V0)] = t/(RrC/[R+r])
V - (r/[R+r])V0) = e(t/(RrC/[R+r])]
And a little rearranging gets me V = e(t/(RrC/[R+r])] + (r/[R+r])V0)

Hmm, did i do something wrong? Even if I subsitute V = RC(dV/dt) into the equation, i will get

V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - e(t/(RrC/[R+r])] - (r/[R+r])V0))

which is not equal to the answer..
 
Last edited:
ProjectENIS said:
Sorry for the mistake,

That will get me

(V - (r/[R+r])V0)-1dV = [-(r/[R+r])RC)]-1dt

Which gets me ln [V - (r/[R+r])V0)] = t/(RrC/[R+r])

You missed to add the arbitrary constant. Your result will be is the same as the given function with the condition that the initial voltage on the capacitor is zero: V(0)=0.

ProjectENIS said:
Hmm, did i do something wrong? Even if I subsitute V = RC(dV/dt) into the equation, i will get

V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - e(t/(RrC/[R+r])] - (r/[R+r])V0))

which is not equal to the answer..

Why do you substitute V=RC(dV/dt)? It is valid for a simple RC circuit only.

ehild
 
Hi again ehild, I added in the arbitrary constant and got the equation! Thank you so much!

Regarding the V = RC (dV/dt), I have misunderstood the derivation, and assumed that it is a general formula for all RC circuits. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll read up on it tonight.

Once again, thanks for your help!
 
You are welcome:smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K