Calculating Voltage Across a Capacitor in a RC Circuit with Two Resistors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the voltage across a capacitor in an RC circuit that includes two resistors and an EMF source. The original poster attempts to derive the voltage expression during the charging phase of the capacitor, specifically aiming to prove a given formula involving exponential decay.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the circuit and the relationships between current, voltage, and resistance. The original poster shares their attempts at manipulating the differential equation and expresses confusion about how to incorporate certain terms into the final expression. Others suggest checking the derivative of the proposed voltage function and clarify the correct form of the differential equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the mathematical approach and clarifying misunderstandings. There is acknowledgment of the need to incorporate an arbitrary constant in the solution, and some participants are exploring different interpretations of the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of initial conditions, specifically that the initial voltage on the capacitor is zero, which is relevant to the derivation of the voltage expression. Additionally, there is a note that the formula V = RC(dV/dt) may not apply universally to all RC circuits, indicating a need for careful consideration of the circuit configuration.

ProjectENIS
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a circuit with two resistors, R and r, and a capacitor of C, and EMF of V0 as shown in the diagram, find the voltage across the capacitor during charging. Prove that this voltage, V is given by V = V0 (r/(R+r)) (1-e-((R+r)t)/(RrC))

Homework Equations



N.A.

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I have

Loop A (with C): V0 + RI + q/c = 0 ==> I = (V0 - VC)/R
Loop B (with r): V0 + RI + rIr = 0
I = Ir + Ic ==> I = V/r + C(dv/dt)

From first and third,
(V0 - VC)/R = V/r + C(dv/dt)

Simplify to get,
V0 - RC(dv/dt) = V(1+R/r)
V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - RC(dV/dt))

The shape of the equation is getting there (I hope), but what do I do next? To get the given equation, RC(dV/dt) must be V0e-((R+r)t)/(RrC).

RC (dV/dt) = V, solving this differential equation to get ln (V) = -t/(RC) + k, hence, RC (dV/dt) = e-t/(RC) + k. And I am totally stuck.

Did I do something wrong somewhere? I can't think of anyway to get the RrC term in e-((R+r)t)/(RrC), not to mention the V0 and the (R+r) terms, unless k is like Rt/r. But that still does not give me a V0?
 

Attachments

  • RC.png
    RC.png
    802 bytes · Views: 1,182
Physics news on Phys.org
The differential equation is correct. You need not solve it to prove that the given V is solution, just plug in V and dV/dt. What is the derivative of the given V(t) function? ehild
 
Hi ehild,

Thanks for your reply.

For the differential equation, V = RC (dV/dt), solved for V = e-t/(RC) + k,

e-t/(RC) + k = RC (dV/dt)

dV/dt = e-t/(RC) + k/RC

Is this what you meant?
 
Last edited:
ProjectENIS said:
Hi ehild,

Thanks for your reply.

For the differential equation, V = RC (dV/dt), solved for V = e-t/(RC) + k,

e-t/(RC) + k = RC (dV/dt)

dV/dt = e-t/(RC) + k/RC

Is this what you meant?

NO.

Your differential equation is not V = RC (dV/dt), but V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - RC(dV/dt)).


ehild
 
Sorry for the mistake,

That will get me

(V - (r/[R+r])V0)-1dV = [-(r/[R+r])RC)]-1dt

Which gets me ln [V - (r/[R+r])V0)] = t/(RrC/[R+r])
V - (r/[R+r])V0) = e(t/(RrC/[R+r])]
And a little rearranging gets me V = e(t/(RrC/[R+r])] + (r/[R+r])V0)

Hmm, did i do something wrong? Even if I subsitute V = RC(dV/dt) into the equation, i will get

V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - e(t/(RrC/[R+r])] - (r/[R+r])V0))

which is not equal to the answer..
 
Last edited:
ProjectENIS said:
Sorry for the mistake,

That will get me

(V - (r/[R+r])V0)-1dV = [-(r/[R+r])RC)]-1dt

Which gets me ln [V - (r/[R+r])V0)] = t/(RrC/[R+r])

You missed to add the arbitrary constant. Your result will be is the same as the given function with the condition that the initial voltage on the capacitor is zero: V(0)=0.

ProjectENIS said:
Hmm, did i do something wrong? Even if I subsitute V = RC(dV/dt) into the equation, i will get

V = (r/[R+r])(V0 - e(t/(RrC/[R+r])] - (r/[R+r])V0))

which is not equal to the answer..

Why do you substitute V=RC(dV/dt)? It is valid for a simple RC circuit only.

ehild
 
Hi again ehild, I added in the arbitrary constant and got the equation! Thank you so much!

Regarding the V = RC (dV/dt), I have misunderstood the derivation, and assumed that it is a general formula for all RC circuits. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll read up on it tonight.

Once again, thanks for your help!
 
You are welcome:smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K