Calculating Volume Between Paraboloids and Cylinder

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of a solid bounded by two paraboloids, \( z = 2x^2 + y^2 \) and \( z = 8 - x^2 - 2y^2 \), and confined within a cylinder defined by \( x^2 + y^2 = 1 \). Participants explore the setup of the volume integral, the determination of bounds, and the relationship between the surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to set up the volume integral and questions the bounds of integration.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of determining which surface is on top and which is below in the region of interest, suggesting that visualizing the surfaces can aid in understanding.
  • A third participant agrees with the previous point and notes that the problem involves finding the volume under each surface and their intersection, if applicable.
  • A later reply confirms that \( z = 8 - x^2 - 2y^2 \) is the upper surface and proposes a specific integral setup for calculating the volume.
  • One participant questions whether the intersection of the surfaces lies within the cylinder and suggests that if it does not, the limits of integration would be determined solely by the cylinder's bounds.
  • Another participant presents an integral they believe represents the volume and asks for confirmation of its correctness.
  • A final reply acknowledges the proposed integral's shape but reiterates the need to check if the intersection of the surfaces is within the cylinder.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to determine the relationship between the surfaces and the cylinder, but there is no consensus on the specifics of the intersection and its implications for the volume calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the potential need to break up the volume integral if the surfaces intersect within the region of integration. There is also mention of the necessity to visualize the surfaces to clarify their relationship.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in advanced calculus, particularly in the context of volume calculations involving multiple surfaces and geometric constraints.

alexcc17
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Find the exact volume of the solid between the paraboloids [itex]z=2x ^{2}+y ^{2}[/itex] and [itex]z=8-x ^{2}-2y ^{2}[/itex] and inside the cylinder [itex]x ^{2}+y ^{2}=1[/itex].

I really don't know how to set this up. Would it be something like ∫∫(2x^2+y^2)-(8-x^2-2y^2)dA + ∫∫(x^2+y^2-1)dA ?

If so, how would I find the bounds of integration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just like integrating areas between two curves in the plane, you need to determine additional information. First, which surface is on top and which surface is below? Rigorously, which function's values are greater in the region we are interested in? This is important for which volume is subtracted from which, as we want the volume of a solid to be positive. If you are not familiar with the equations of paraboloids, graph some cross sections to get a picture of the surface. If you have access to a 3d-graphing system, use that to verify your answer.
Next, where do the surfaces intersect within the region of interest, if anywhere? If they intersect within the region you are integrating over (the circle x^2 + y^2 = 1), you may need to break up the volume integral, as the volume changes sign if the surface that used to be below crosses the second surface and is now on top (just like when curves cross each other when doing area integrals).
Finally, use your information to determine the region in the xy-plane over which you will integrate the volume under the surfaces. If they do not intersect, you are simply integrating over the circular region x^2+y^2 = 1, which covers a cylindrical region of volume. Once you set up your integral correctly, you may want to change to a more convenient system of coordinates for integrating over a circular region, such as cylindrical coordinates.
 
Last edited:
What he said :)

If you already know how to find the volume under a surface z=f(x,y) inside a cylinder, the this problem is likely a matter of doing exactly that for each surface and finding the difference. The likely gotcha is if the surfaces themselves intersect inside the cylinder.

It is often easier to change coordinates to suit the symmetry.
 
Thanks guys! z=8-x^2-2y^2 is on top

So would it be... ∫∫(8-x^2-2y^2)-(2x^2+y^2)dA + ∫∫(x^2+y^2-1)dA ?

I get how to solve the function for the volume, but typically I would find the bounds by setting the surfaces equal to each other to find intersection points and such, but setting them equal...
I get 9=4y^2 + 4x^2
 
So the intersection is a circle at a constant z?! (you should always relate your equations to geometry.)
1. Check to see if any part of that intersection lies inside x^2+y^2=1 (the cylinder).

if none of it does - then the limits are entirely determined by the bounds of the cylinder instead of the intersection curve. (You realize you can do a volume integral between any limits you like - you are not restricted to the region between two surfaces?)
 
Alright! So, I found that...
[itex]\int\limits_{-1}^{1}\int\limits_{-\sqrt{1-x ^{2}}}^{\sqrt{1-x ^{2}}}8-3x ^{2}-3y ^{2}dydx[/itex]
I found the square root part because [itex]y=\sqrt{1-x ^{2}}[/itex]

Is this correct, so all I have to do now is solve?

Thank you
 
That looks like the right shape - you understand that I'm not going to actually do it unless someone pays me :)

Did you check to see if any of the intersection of the surfaces was inside the cylinder in question?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K