Calculating Work and Energy for Moving Charges: A Case Study

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating work and energy for two charges, q1 = 3.0µC and q2 = −4.0µC, initially separated by 2 cm and moved to a final separation of 5 cm. The work done by the electric field is determined to be negative, while the work done by the external agent is positive. The calculations involve the potential energy change, ΔU, using the formula W = -ΔU, confirming the relationship between work and energy in electrostatics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric forces
  • Familiarity with potential energy in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of work-energy principles in physics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric potential energy in detail
  • Learn about the integration of Coulomb forces for work calculations
  • Explore the implications of charge sign on work done in electric fields
  • Investigate the relationship between work, energy, and electric fields in various configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts of work and energy in electric fields.

Fabio010
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Two charges
q1 = 3.0µC and q2 = −4.0µC initially are separated by a distance ro = 2cm.

An external agent moves the charges until they are rf = 5cm apart.

a) How much work is done by the electric field moving the charged from ro to rf? Is it negative or positive? What is the work done by a external agent? Is it positive or negative?

Attempt:

-W = ΔU

Initial U = ke*(q1*q2)/(ro)

Final U = ke*(q1*q2)/(rf)

-W = ke*(q1*q2)/(rf) -ke*(q1*q2)/(ro) the work is positive.

Because the Wext = -W, then Wext is negative. I think that my attempt is wrong because in next questions it answers for the potential energy of the initial state...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fabio010 said:
the work is positive.

Your equations look good, but not the conclusion. Check the signs again.
 
first of all sorry for posting in the wrong section.


because rf > ro

ke*(q1*q2)/(rf) -ke*(q1*q2)/(ro) is going to be a negative number

so W = -ΔU , W is positive.

something is escaping me...?
 
Fabio010 said:
something is escaping me...?

The charges have opposite signs.
 
TSny said:
The charges have opposite signs.

damn... :)So the work done by the electric field is negative, and the work done by the external agent is positive.

But one more question. The following questions of the exercise are.

c) what is the potential energy of the initial state where the charges are ro = 2 cm apart?

d) what is the potential energy of the initial state where the charges are ro = 5 cm apart?

e) what is the change in potential energy from the initial state to the final state?Based in the logic of these questions, my answer for the first 2 questions (work done by the electric field and the external agent) is wrong. Don't you think so?
 
So, you've essentially already answered c, d, and e in answering a and b. Two possibilities: (1) maybe they want you to be clear on the signs of each quantity and how they are all related. (2) Maybe they want you to get the work in part (a) by explicit integration of the Coulomb force.

I don't know. But what you've done looks fine to me.
 
Ok thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K