Calculating Work Function from Retarding Potential of 2.92V for 250nm Radiation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The work function of a photoemitter can be calculated using the equation PHI = hc/lambda - eV, where the retarding potential is 2.92V and the radiation wavelength is 250nm. The variable e represents the elementary charge, 1.602 x 10^-19 C. The discussion clarifies that using Ve as 2.92 eV simplifies calculations, as energy in electron-volts directly corresponds to the voltage value. Both methods yield the same work function when calculated correctly, emphasizing the importance of consistent unit usage.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect
  • Familiarity with the constants: Planck's constant (h) and the elementary charge (e)
  • Knowledge of wavelength and frequency relationships in electromagnetic radiation
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions between joules and electron-volts
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate work function using different units (joules and electron-volts)
  • Study the implications of retarding potential in photoelectric experiments
  • Explore the relationship between wavelength, frequency, and energy in electromagnetic radiation
  • Investigate the significance of Planck's constant in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and the photoelectric effect, as well as researchers working with photoemission techniques.

jaidon
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
The photocurrent of a photocell is cut off by a retarding potential of 2.92V for radiation of wavelength 250nm. What is the work function of the photoemitter?


I want to use the equation: PHI=hc/lambda-Ve, where V is the stopping voltage (sorrry I don't know how to do the Greek letters for PHI and lambda).

My question: is Ve just 2.92 or is V 2.92 and e 1.602*10^-19? I have tried both ways, adjusting h as required, and I get two different answers. Using Ve=2.92 gives a answer that makes more sense, but I don't quite understand why V=2.92 is not just V. Any advice? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you want retarding potential

V = \frac{h}{e} \nu - \frac{\Phi}{e}
and nu = c / lambda, soo

V = \frac{h}{e} \frac{c}{\lambda} - \frac{\Phi}{e}

rearrange to give

\Phi = \frac{hc}{\lambda} - eV

blind substitution hereafter
 
jaidon said:
The photocurrent of a photocell is cut off by a retarding potential of 2.92V for radiation of wavelength 250nm. What is the work function of the photoemitter?


I want to use the equation: PHI=hc/lambda-Ve, where V is the stopping voltage (sorrry I don't know how to do the Greek letters for PHI and lambda).

My question: is Ve just 2.92 or is V 2.92 and e 1.602*10^-19? I have tried both ways, adjusting h as required, and I get two different answers. Using Ve=2.92 gives a answer that makes more sense, but I don't quite understand why V=2.92 is not just V. Any advice? Thanks

The answer is the same both ways. If you decide to use eV for energy instead of joules, you'll get phi in eV.

1 eV = (1.6*10^-19C)(1V)= 1.6*10^-19 J

e=1.6*10^-19C

so (2.92V)(e)=2.92 eV=2.92*1.6*19^-19 J

Whenever you see some voltage times e, it is easier to use electron-volts, as the energy is just the same number as the voltage.

Try getting the answer for the work function in joules and also eV (be sure to use the right number for h each time). Then convert from one to the other. They should be the same.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K