Calculating Work to Compression a Spring 4.08cm with 718N Force"

  • Thread starter Thread starter kdizzle711
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work required to compress a spring a specific distance, based on a previous calculation involving a different distance and force. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically relating to spring force and work-energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the spring constant and the work-energy equation, questioning the consistency of the spring constant used in calculations. There is an exploration of the relationship between force, distance, and work done on the spring.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the calculations and the approach taken by the original poster. Guidance has been offered regarding the necessity of using the same spring constant throughout the calculations, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific distances (3.09 cm and 4.08 cm) and a force of 718 N, which are critical to the problem but may lead to confusion if not consistently applied. The original poster's calculations appear to be influenced by previous work done on the spring, which may not align with the current problem setup.

kdizzle711
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
To stretch a spring a distance 3.09cm from its unstretched length, an amount of work of11.1j must be done. How much work must be done to compress this spring a distance 4.08 from its unstretched length?

I have been using the equation
k=Fx/x
W=(1/2)kx2^2-(1/2)kx1^2

11.1=(1/2)(Fx/.0309)*(.0309^2)-(0)
Fx=718N

So I plug 718N into
W=(1/2)(718/.0408)*(.0408^2)
I get 14.6 but it is still not the right answer someone please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've put in an unneeded extra step here in solving for F, and in so doing, you have made in error in your last equation. If you solved that k = 718/.0309 in the first step, why are you using k=718/.0408 in the other? The k must be the same.
 
kdizzle711 said:
I have been using the equation
k=Fx/x
You won't need this, since you don't care about the force.
W=(1/2)kx2^2-(1/2)kx1^2
You'll need this.

First step: Use the data for the 3.09 cm stretch to find k.
 
Thank you, I didnt even notice that
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K