MHB Calculation of odds: probability and deviation

sfairbrother243
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
*WARNING* My understanding of maths is pretty limited and i don't know if i am being really stupid or not.

Ive been looking into data analysis of football matches, working out proabilities of certain situations happening and how steady the averages are. i come across a website which as really helped me understand some of these concepts. But 2 calculations have left me stumped and i don't know if it is me being stupid or the author getting something wrong?

the author had gone through all matches in prem league from 2005/10 showing % of home, draws and away wins. she then worked out the means for these, then went into the relative and absolute deviation then ended with using this data to obtain the minimum and maximum odds:

The formula for the computation of odds is as follows:
Home win: 48.16% probability results in a price of 2.08 (1 divided by 48.16%)

The minimum odds are computed as follows:
Home win: 2.08 calculated odds multiplied by (1 minus ‘error’(relative deviation) 4.14%) = 1.99

The maximum odds are computed as follows:
Home win: 2.08 calculated odds multiplied by (1 plus ‘error’(relative deviation) 4.14%) = 2.17

am i being very stupid as to why i can't get 1.99 and 2.17 as my answers?

many thanks guys!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sfairbrother243 said:
*WARNING* My understanding of maths is pretty limited and i don't know if i am being really stupid or not.

Ive been looking into data analysis of football matches, working out proabilities of certain situations happening and how steady the averages are. i come across a website which as really helped me understand some of these concepts. But 2 calculations have left me stumped and i don't know if it is me being stupid or the author getting something wrong?

the author had gone through all matches in prem league from 2005/10 showing % of home, draws and away wins. she then worked out the means for these, then went into the relative and absolute deviation then ended with using this data to obtain the minimum and maximum odds:

The formula for the computation of odds is as follows:
Home win: 48.16% probability results in a price of 2.08 (1 divided by 48.16%)

The minimum odds are computed as follows:
Home win: 2.08 calculated odds multiplied by (1 minus ‘error’(relative deviation) 4.14%) = 1.99

The maximum odds are computed as follows:
Home win: 2.08 calculated odds multiplied by (1 plus ‘error’(relative deviation) 4.14%) = 2.17

am i being very stupid as to why i can't get 1.99 and 2.17 as my answers?

many thanks guys!
What you have to remember here is that a percentage is measured on a scale from 0 to 100, whereas a probability is measured on a scale from 0 to 1. What that means is that to convert a percentage of 4.14% to a probability you have to divide it by 100, getting 0.0414. The formula for "minimum odds" say that you need to subtract this probability from 1 (getting 0.9586) and then multiply that by 2.08. That gives the answer 1.99 (to two decimal places). The calculation for the "maximum odds" will be similar.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top