MHB Calculation of the inverse matrix - Number of operations

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the inverse of a regular n x n matrix using the Gauss algorithm and LU-decomposition. It is established that the inverse can be computed with n^3 + O(n^2) operations, where one operation is defined as a multiplication or division. The conversation highlights that LU-decomposition requires approximately 4/3 n^3 operations, while Gaussian elimination with back-substitution costs n^3 multiplications and n^3 + O(n^2) additions. Participants note the importance of considering both multiplication and addition operations in these calculations, as older references may overlook addition due to its relative speed. The overall conclusion emphasizes the efficiency of the Gauss algorithm in matrix inversion.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let A be a regular ($n\times n$)-Matrix, for which the Gauss algorithm is possible.

If we choose as the right side $b$ the unit vectors $$e^{(1)}=(1, 0, \ldots , 0)^T, \ldots , e^{(n)}=(0, \ldots , 0, 1 )^T$$ and calculate the corresponding solutions $x^{(1)}, \ldots , x^{(n)}$ then the inverse matrix is $A^{-1}=[x^{(1)}, \ldots , x^{(n)}]$.

We can calculate the inverse with $n^3+O(n^2)$ operations. (1 operation = 1 multiplication or division)
If we calculate the solutions $x^{(1)}, \ldots , x^{(n)}$ with the using the LU-decomposition we get $\frac{4}{3}n^3+O(n^2)$ operations, or not?

It is because we apply the the Gauss algorithm which requires $\frac{1}{3}n^3+O(n^2)$ operations, right?

How do we get $n^3+O(n^2)$ ?

Do we have to use an other algorithm here?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let A be a regular ($n\times n$)-Matrix, for which the Gauss algorithm is possible.

If we choose as the right side $b$ the unit vectors $$e^{(1)}=(1, 0, \ldots , 0)^T, \ldots , e^{(n)}=(0, \ldots , 0, 1 )^T$$ and calculate the corresponding solutions $x^{(1)}, \ldots , x^{(n)}$ then the inverse matrix is $A^{-1}=[x^{(1)}, \ldots , x^{(n)}]$.

We can calculate the inverse with $n^3+O(n^2)$ operations. (1 operation = 1 multiplication or division)
If we calculate the solutions $x^{(1)}, \ldots , x^{(n)}$ with the using the LU-decomposition we get $\frac{4}{3}n^3+O(n^2)$ operations, or not?

Hey mathmari! (Smile)

LU-decomposition is listed here as $\frac 23 n^3 +O(n^2)$, while QR-decomposition with Householder reflections (for numerical stability) is $\frac 43n^3+O(n^2)$. (Nerd)

mathmari said:
It is because we apply the the Gauss algorithm which requires $\frac{1}{3}n^3+O(n^2)$ operations, right?

How do we get $n^3+O(n^2)$ ?

Do we have to use an other algorithm here?

That's indeed to get the matrix in row echelon form.
Afterwards we still need to solve it for each of the n unit vectors, which takes $\frac 12 n^3 + O(n^2)$ extra if I'm no mistaken. (Thinking)
 
mathmari said:
We can calculate the inverse with $n^3+O(n^2)$ operations. (1 operation = 1 multiplication or division)

When comparing operation counts for different methods and from different references, it is perhaps useful (but maybe already known to all participating, in which case I apologize for stating the obvious) that older references sometimes neglect addition (which includes subtraction) because multiplication (which includes division) used to be the determining factor, as it was much slower.

I learned that inversion using Gaussian elimination with back-substitution costs $n^3$ multiplications (exactly) and $n^3 + O(n^2)$ additions. Interestingly, for Gauss-Jordan the count is precisely the same.

(Elimination with back-substitution for one system costs $\frac{n^3}{2} + O(n^2)$ multiplications and $\frac{n^3}{2} + O(n)$ (no typo) additions.)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
998
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K