MHB Calculation when Mixing Two Compounds....

haubenkoch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear Comunity,

I am running into a (probably pretty simple) problem here, yet the most simple things are sometimes upon me...:(

I have a liquid solution which consists of 70% compound A and 30% compound B.
I also have a bottle with 100% compound A.

What I would like to do is to achieve a concentration of 80% compound A and 20% compound B. Can someone tell me how this is calculated?

I was thinking of something like c1*v1=c2*v2 but this doesn't get me anywhere...am I missing something?

Any help on this would be very much appreciated!

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would set it up as follows:

Let $x$ be the amount of solution you currently have, the 7:3 mix. Then let $y$ be the amount of 100% compound A you wish to add. Thus we want:

$$0.7x+y=0.8(x+y)$$

Do you see how both sides of the equation represent the amount of compound A present in the final solution? The left side represents the initial amount of compound A plus the amount added. The right side reflects the fact that we want 80% of the final amount to be compound A.

Now you may solve this for $y$ as a function of $x$. What do you find?
 
Hello, haubenkoch!

We can disregard references to compound B.

I have a liquid solution which is 70% alcohol.
I also have a bottle with 100% alcohol.

I would like a concentration of 80% alcohol.
This is an explanation of MarkFL's solution.Let x = liters of 70% alcohol.
It contains 0.7x liters of alcohol.

We add y liters of 100% alcohol.
It contains y liters of alcohol.

The mixture contains 0.7x + y liters of alcohol. .[1]But we know that the mixture will be
. . x+y liters which is 80% alcohol.
It contains 0.8(x+y) liters of alcohol. .[2]We just described the final amount of alcohol in two ways.

There is our equation! ..0.7x + y \:=\:0.8(x+y)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top