Calculus Maniacs: Apostol vs Courant

  • Thread starter Thread starter karakoos23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apostol
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around preferences for calculus textbooks, specifically comparing Tom M. Apostol’s and Richard Courant’s works. Participants explore their accessibility, clarity, and suitability for different audiences, particularly young students.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the discussion is about learning calculus directly from Apostol or Courant's books.
  • Another participant notes that both texts are straightforward for those already familiar with calculus.
  • A participant mentions the historical context of the texts, stating Apostol was published around 1960 and Courant around 1935, expressing a preference for Courant while suggesting Apostol might be more accessible for younger students.
  • Another participant introduces N. Piskunov’s work as a user-friendly alternative for young students, indicating a preference for it over the other two texts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing preferences for the textbooks, with no consensus on which is superior or more suitable for learning calculus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the historical publication dates of the texts and their perceived accessibility, but do not provide specific criteria for what makes one text better than the other.

karakoos23
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If you were a maniac of calculus what would it be? Tom M. Apostol’s or Richard Courant’s Calculus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean learning Calculus straight from those books? I wouldn't know.

But knowing calculus from before, both are quite straightforward.
 
they are both excellent. apostol was writtena biut 1960 and courant about 1935. i think i would choose courant, but as a young student operhaps apostol would have been more accesible. actually spivak is the most user friendly for young students.
 
I love N. Piskunov, Mir publishers, (English translation by G.Yankovsky).
 

Similar threads

Calculus Calculus Textbook: Courant vs Apostol
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Calculus Calculus book between Stewart & Spivak levels
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Undergrad How Accurate is Propositional Logic in Explaining Multiple Integrals?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
MHB Book recommendations for self studying calculus.
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Undergrad What would a calculus author have to say on ##\int r^2dm##?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Other Is it worth doing EVERY problem in a textbook?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Calculus Can I skip the introduction in Apostol's calculus?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Intro Physics Looking for an Introductory Physics Book without Flashy Presentation?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Calculus Apostol's vol 1 calculus not as good as Stewart's calculus?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Calculus Does Apostol Calculus Volume 2 cover sufficient multivariate calculus?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K