Calculus of variations for suspended rope

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculus of variations applied to a suspended rope problem, specifically focusing on minimizing potential energy. The potential energy is expressed as U(y) = -ρg∫y ds, with ds defined as √(1+y'²)dx. The use of Lagrange multipliers is highlighted for solving the problem under the fixed length constraint L, while the boundary conditions y(-a)=y(a)=0 are noted as implicit in the differential equation solution. The participants seek clarification on the physical justification for the expression of ds and the treatment of boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus of variations
  • Familiarity with Lagrange multipliers
  • Knowledge of potential energy concepts in physics
  • Basic differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of potential energy in variational problems
  • Explore Lagrange multipliers in constrained optimization
  • Investigate boundary value problems in differential equations
  • Learn about the physical interpretation of infinitesimal elements in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those interested in optimization problems and the calculus of variations.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
So perhaps you know this classical problem: A rope is suspended between two endpoints x=±a. Find what function describing the shape of the rope that will minimize its potential energy.
The example is worked through in my book but I have some questions:
The solution assumes uniform linear density which makes sense. However, in calculating the potential energy of the rope they write:
U(y) = -ρg∫y ds , ds = √(1+y'2)dx

First question:
I want to discuss this ds. What physically justifies using this as your "weight" for the average potential energy?

The book then proceeds to solve the problem using lagrange multipliers since the constraint is that the length of the rope remains fixed L. However, my book never mentions anything about the constraint y(-a)=y(a)=0. Why does this constraint not have to be taken into account?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
However, in calculating the potential energy of the rope they write:
U(y) = -ρg∫y ds , ds = √(1+y'2)dx

First question:
I want to discuss this ds. What physically justifies using this as your "weight" for the average potential energy?

The infinitesimal mass element of the rope is dM = ρ ds, ds = √(dx2+dy2), right? Then you have dU = -dM g y like usual

aaaa202 said:
The book then proceeds to solve the problem using lagrange multipliers since the constraint is that the length of the rope remains fixed L. However, my book never mentions anything about the constraint y(-a)=y(a)=0. Why does this constraint not have to be taken into account?
You take this into account when you solve the resulting differential equation. They give the boundary conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K