Calculus Calculus Textbook: Courant vs Apostol

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between Courant and Apostol as calculus textbooks, with a mention of reading Spivak alongside. Participants highlight that both Apostol and Courant are excellent resources, with Courant offering numerous applications and a charming, traditional style, while Apostol is noted for its meticulous approach and strong problem sets. There is a consensus that working through either book provides a solid understanding of calculus. Preferences vary, with some favoring Courant for its engaging style and others leaning toward Apostol for its thoroughness. Overall, both texts are recommended for their quality and effectiveness in teaching calculus.
vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hi! I was looking for a Calculus textbook to buy and was debating between Courant and Apostol. I was planning on reading Spivak parallel to one of these. My question is does Apostol cover more material than Courant does or are they practically the same. Sorry if this has already been asked, I was unable to find the thread.! Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the other calculus books, but Courant's book is great. It's worth reading anyway!
 
My preference is Apostol. Truthfully, if you manage to work through most of either one, you will know a lot of calculus. Both are terrific. Courant has plenty of applications. Apostol has good problems.
 
I lean towards Courant, but I know others who prefer Apostol.
 
in my view, all are excellent. courant is old fashioned and charming, spivak is modern and fun, apostol is very meticulous and scholarly.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top