Calculus with logs and natural logs

  • Thread starter Thread starter brandy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Natural
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of logarithmic functions, specifically the integrals and derivatives of log and natural log (ln). Participants express confusion regarding the definitions and relationships between these logarithmic forms and their respective calculus operations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the derivatives and integrals of log x and ln x, questioning the apparent discrepancies between their definitions. Some participants explore the conventions surrounding the base of logarithms, while others discuss the implications of different bases in calculus.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the definitions and conventions of logarithms. There is a recognition of varying interpretations based on context, particularly between mathematical and engineering literature. Guidance has been offered regarding the common usage of log in different fields, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's prior knowledge about the relationship between ln x and log x, as well as the potential for confusion stemming from different conventions in literature. The discussion also touches on the diminishing use of common logarithms in favor of natural logarithms in various contexts.

brandy
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
im confused as to what the integrals and differentials of log and ln are.

i looked up the derivative of log x and it said it was 1/x
so then the integral of 1/x should be log x but i thought it was ln x
im so confused!
please help me

just say
integral of log x
differential of log x

integral of 1/x
differential of 1/x

integral of ln x
differential of ln x

and i will be happy.

... and possibly a proof if ur bothered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
btw i do know that ln x = log x / log e.

but log x / log e does not = log x / log 10
and nowhere did i see that the log had a base e.
 
When you write \log x, what base logarithm is that, to you? A lot of people will use the convention that \log x means the natural logarithm, the same thing as \ln x. If they want to write a logarithm to a different base, they'll specify it explicitly (as in \log_{10} x, the base 10 logarithm). That's what you're seeing when you look up the derivative of \log x.
 
To add to what diazona said. Here mathematicians always mean ln x when they write log x (without specifying the base) and physicists and engineers tend to always write ln x for the log with base e and log x for the log with base 10. So you always have to pay attention to what kind of literature you're reading and/or what kind of problems you're solving. If a text tells you that d/dx log x=1/x you immediately know they mean the log with base e.
 
"Common logarithm", base 20, were originally used to facilitate computation. With calculators that is no longer necessary and common logs are becoming less "common". It has long been the case that "log" was used to mean natural logarithms in advanced math and, I suspect, that usage is becoming more common in "lower" mathematics as "common" logarithms become less used.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K