Cambridge master's degrees question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between the MASt and MPhil Master's programs at Cambridge University, particularly in the fields of physics and mathematics. The MASt is characterized as a theoretical program, while the MPhil is a research-based degree. Participants noted that completing the Part III program is a common prerequisite for PhD applications, although it is not mandatory. Admission to CASM is perceived as easier for candidates with first-class honors, but specific requirements can vary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cambridge University's Master's programs, specifically MASt and MPhil.
  • Familiarity with the Part III program and its role in PhD admissions.
  • Knowledge of academic grading systems, particularly first-class honors.
  • Awareness of research methodologies relevant to physics and mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific curriculum and focus areas of the MASt and MPhil programs at Cambridge.
  • Investigate the requirements and structure of the Part III program.
  • Explore funding options and their impact on admission to CASM.
  • Examine the career trajectories of graduates from MASt and MPhil programs in physics and mathematics.
USEFUL FOR

Prospective Master's students in physics and mathematics, academic advisors, and individuals considering a PhD at Cambridge University.

batboio
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello all! I am going to begin the last year of my Bachelor's course in physics in about a month and it's about time to start searching for some Master's degree opportunities. I decided I might just as well try my luck at Cambridge but the problem (one of the many problems actually :P) is that the British education system seems really complicated :) I've been looking for a Master's course in physics or mathematics but there are different Master's programs and I don't know which one is the best for me if I want ot pursue a science career.

So can someone please enlighten me to what is the difference between MASt and MPhil as these seem to be the options. Also any other advice will be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CASM or part III is the 4th year of a Cambridge undergrad masters. An MPhil is masters degree done by research.
 
Part III is known to be notoriously hard and it is a prerequisite for application (?) to the Cambridge PhD program. But yes, anything else that you need to know, can be found on the website of the Maths department or some other relevant page. You shouldn't be confused, now that Matt has cleared this up.
 
It's typically a pre-req for the PhD program and most people who apply are from Part III. You can still get in without it, but it's much harder (I think) since taking Part III is the norm. Also, only a small percentage from Part III actually go on to the PhD program so it really narrows itself down.

I'm not really sure what the difficulty in getting into CASM is though. Someone on this forum said it's really quite easy if you're at least first-class honors (or equivalent) and can deal with the funding. However, I'm a bit skeptical of this and beyond that one source, I have no idea what the admissions is like.
 
Anonymous217 said:
I'm not really sure what the difficulty in getting into CASM is though. Someone on this forum said it's really quite easy if you're at least first-class honors (or equivalent) and can deal with the funding. However, I'm a bit skeptical of this and beyond that one source, I have no idea what the admissions is like.

I haven't been able to find a lot of information on this either, but would certainly like some.
 
ahsanxr said:
I haven't been able to find a lot of information on this either, but would certainly like some.

I've heard a few people say that their offer for a place on part III was dependent on them getting an average degree mark of 80%. Although i have spoken to someone who's done part III and he said that a 1.1 should see you in.
 
Thank you for the replies. You've pretty much told me only about the MASt in mathematics. How about physics? And I know that MPhil is done by research but could you clarify what will be the benefits from a MPhil compared to a MASt (or a MASt compared to a MPhil)? I've read that MPhil is considered to be a bit higher degree. And most importantly which one is better if I want to continue with a PhD afterwards?
 
Last edited:
batboio said:
Thank you for the replies. You've pretty much told me only about the MASt in mathematics. How about physics? And I know that MPhil is done by research but could you clarify what will be the benefits from a MPhil compared to a MASt (or a MASt compared to a MPhil)? I've read that MPhil is considered to be a bit higher degree. And most importantly which one is better if I want to continue with a PhD afterwards?

Depends what area you want to do your PhD in. MASt is purely theoretical.
 
matt91a said:
Depends what area you want to do your PhD in. MASt is purely theoretical.

Thank you I think MASt is the thing for me then :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
713
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
959
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
628