Can 5D Wormholes Make Instant Global Shipping Possible?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rodsika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wormhole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical possibility of using five-dimensional (5D) wormholes for instant global shipping, specifically between locations like New York and Europe. Participants explore concepts from General Relativity, the implications of extra dimensions, and the feasibility of creating wormholes for practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if General Relativity can accommodate up to 100 dimensions, it might be possible to create wormholes that allow for instantaneous shipping across vast distances.
  • There is a suggestion that utilizing higher-dimensional space could reduce the energy required to create such wormholes.
  • One participant requests the Schwarzschild solution in 100 dimensions, indicating a desire to verify their understanding of the implications of extra dimensions.
  • Another participant argues that while extra dimensions may assist in the creation of quantum wormholes, the actual dynamics of 5D wormholes do not necessarily allow for shortcuts in the conventional sense, as they may lead to regions outside the known universe.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the Planck mass and the number of dimensions, suggesting that reduced Planck mass in higher dimensions could facilitate the creation of micro black holes and wormholes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and implications of 5D wormholes. While some see potential benefits in using extra dimensions for wormhole creation, others challenge the practicality and dynamics of such constructs, leading to an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the discussion regarding the application of General Relativity in higher dimensions, the dependence on theoretical constructs, and the lack of consensus on the implications of extra dimensions for wormhole dynamics.

rodsika
Messages
278
Reaction score
2
General Relativity can work up to 100 dimensions or more. Supposed Lisa Randall were right and there were extra large dimensions. Would it be easier to build wormhole between say New York and Europe so packages sent in futuristic Fedex would take instantaneously time to get transfered?

It's like instead of pulling together space between New York and Europe, one can take shortcut through higher dimensional space with much less energy. Does General Relativity allow this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
General Relativity can work up to 100 dimensions or more.
If that is so, could you please post the Schwarzschild solution in 100 dimensions. I'd like to check my work.
Supposed Lisa Randall were right and there were extra large dimensions. Would it be easier to build wormhole between say New York and Europe so packages sent in futuristic Fedex would take instantaneously time to get transfered?
Lisa Randall's ideas about large extra dimensions are well motivated, for reasons which do *not* include traveling faster than light, backwards in time, etc. Despite anything you may have heard, Fedex does not sponsor her research.
 
Bill_K said:
If that is so, could you please post the Schwarzschild solution in 100 dimensions. I'd like to check my work.

Lisa Randall's ideas about large extra dimensions are well motivated, for reasons which do *not* include traveling faster than light, backwards in time, etc. Despite anything you may have heard, Fedex does not sponsor her research.

What I was saying was that any additional dimension always gives extra degree of freedom. For example. In Flatlanders. If you bend a flat sheet of paper with the ends touching. You can make the 2D flatlanders jump end to end without going in between. Similarly if reality was 5D. Can we pull stunt like it where we don't have to bend space and time by using massive energy but simply taking a jump to that 5 dimension and exiting it in another place far with least amount of energy expenditures? Does General Relativity allow such dynamics? How?
 
rodsika said:
General Relativity can work up to 100 dimensions or more. Supposed Lisa Randall were right and there were extra large dimensions. Would it be easier to build wormhole between say New York and Europe so packages sent in futuristic Fedex would take instantaneously time to get transfered?


Extra dimension only assist the creation of quantum wormholes (and black holes). The minimum mass for such an object is the so-called Planck mass. The effective Planck decreases with the number of dimensions. This is why the possibility of finding micro black holes and wormholes was serious considered for the Large Hadron Collider. The Planck mass, reduced by presumed extra dimensions, would be within the energy range of the LHC.

So if the 1st step in creating macroscopic wormhole is to create a quantum wormhole (that can be expanded), the answer is, "Yes, 5D slightly helps."

It's like instead of pulling together space between New York and Europe, one can take shortcut through higher dimensional space with much less energy. Does General Relativity allow this?

No. The only new feature of a 5D wormhole connecting widely separated regions in of a 4D universe is the possibility of a traveler going "off brane", i.e. entering the wormhole and finding himself emerging in the void external to the universe.

I found this http://www.webfilesuci.org/wormholefaq.html" that explained a lot for me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K