Can a 2N by 2N matrix written in terms of N by N matrices?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sokrates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Matrix Terms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of a 2N by 2N matrix in terms of N by N matrices, particularly focusing on Hermitian matrices. Participants seek mathematical proofs, numerical methods, and references related to this topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a need for a hard mathematical proof or numerical method to represent a 2N by 2N matrix using N by N matrices.
  • Another participant suggests proving that the set {I₂, σᵢ} forms a basis for Hermitian 2x2 matrices, indicating that this result can be extended to 2N by 2N matrices by using block form.
  • A participant provides a specific form of a 2x2 Hermitian matrix and describes how it can be expressed in terms of Pauli matrices, raising the question of how to generalize this to 2N by 2N matrices.
  • One participant concludes that they can derive the 2N by 2N matrix representation by explicitly writing it out and selecting appropriate parameters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the generalization to 2N by 2N matrices, and multiple approaches are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of Hermitian matrices and the specific forms of matrices being considered, which may not be fully articulated or resolved.

sokrates
Messages
481
Reaction score
2
I posted this question over at the QM page,

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=714076

but I realized I am really looking for a

hard Mathematical proof ...

A description of a numerical way of proving this would also be very helpful for me.

or a reference covering the subject.

Many thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a warmup, would you know how to prove that ##\{ I_{2}, \sigma_i\}## is a basis for Hermitian ##2\times 2## matrices? The result for ##2N\times 2N## will follow by writing the matrix in block form and using the basis as explained by wle in that thread.
 
Yes - I can do the 2x2 proof I guess.

Because any 2x2 Hermitian matrix can be written as:

<br /> H=\begin{bmatrix}<br /> a &amp; c -i \ d \\<br /> c + i \ d &amp; b <br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

where a,b,c,d are all real numbers.

Then H can be uniquely defined in terms of Pauli matrices:
<br /> \frac{1}{2}\left[ (a+b) \ I_{2\times 2} + (a-b) \ \sigma_z + 2 \ c \ \sigma_x + 2 \ d \ \sigma_y\right]<br />

But how to extend this to 2N by 2N ?
 
Yes, I got it ...

Just write it out explicitly and choose A,B,C,D accordingly to get the random 2N by 2N matrix.

Many thanks for directing me to that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K