Can a 3-axis gyroscope assembly resist movement in all directions?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PH7SICS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyroscopes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a 3-axis gyroscope assembly and whether it can resist movement in all directions. Participants explore the theoretical implications of combining multiple gyroscopes oriented along the X, Y, and Z axes, focusing on concepts such as angular momentum, precession, and resistance to motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that a single gyroscope resists changes to its orientation due to angular momentum, requiring more force to alter its position.
  • Others argue that combining three gyroscopes would result in a net vector angular momentum that does not cancel out, suggesting that the assembly would behave like a single gyroscope.
  • There is a contention regarding whether the assembly would resist motion in the X, Y, and Z planes, with some asserting it would not, while others clarify that it would resist rotation only along the axis parallel to the resultant angular momentum.
  • Participants discuss the implications of gyroscopes rotating in opposite directions, suggesting that this would lead to no net angular momentum, thus not acting as a gyroscope.
  • Some participants emphasize that the assembly would not resist translational motion any differently than an object of the same mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the assembly would resist motion in all directions. There are competing views on the behavior of the gyroscope assembly, particularly regarding its resistance to motion and the implications of angular momentum.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about the behavior of gyroscopes under various configurations and the effects of angular momentum, but these assumptions remain unresolved and depend on specific conditions.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in gyroscopic motion, mechanical engineering, or physics may find the discussion relevant, particularly those exploring applications in stabilization technologies.

PH7SICS
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, 1st post on this forum and I have a question about gyroscopes

I have noticed that a gyroscope wheel if spinning rapidly will resist motion along the plane of the axis or spindle of the spinning wheel. For example if the wheel is horizontal and you try to move it in a vertical direction you can feel that there is a resistance to that motion.
My question is if you were to assemble 3 gyroscope wheels so that the axis of each wheel were along the X, Y & Z planes would the resulting assembly resist motion in all directions or would the result be that there would not be any resistance to movement in any direction, assuming that all wheels are of the same value and of equal rpm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They would cancel each other out (via forces in the interconnecting structure), and you would not feel the resistance of "precession" anymore.

Here's an introduction to precession for more info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession


< EDIT -- Turns out I was wrong in the above assumption -- there will still be a net vector angular momentum in an x-y-z gyroscope. See the following posts. >
 
Last edited:
berkeman said:
They would cancel each other out (via forces in the interconnecting structure), and you would not feel the resistance of "precession" anymore.

I don't agree. In fact gyroscopes DO NOT oppose to rotation. They just rotate in a direction different from what "normal" objects do. You can "force" a gyroscope to turn in any direction.
But when you do it, you realize that the forces (in reality the torque) that you are actually applying are not what intuition predicts.

When you put three gyroscopes in X, Y and Z, their angular momentum add vectorially and the sum is never zero. The resulting object behaves as a gyroscope whose angular momentum is the sum of the moments. It is not simple to treat each gyro and its forces separately. I have never tried.
 
I counter disagree. Gyroscopes tend to resist changes to its orientation due to its the angular momentum. By resist, I don't mean you cannot change their orientation, but that it will require more force than if it were not spinning.

I do agree that the addition of the angular momentum of 3 perpendicular gyroscopes would result in a non-zero sum.

Back to the original post: With that last note in mind, by having three gyroscopes built into one, you would only be creating a new device that behaves exactly like a single gyroscope.
 
mezarashi said:
I counter disagree. Gyroscopes tend to resist changes to its orientation due to its the angular momentum. By resist, I don't mean you cannot change their orientation, but that it will require more force than if it were not spinning.

As you like.
 
Using right hand rule, assume that the angular momentum vectors point forward, left, and up. The sum of these vectors would point 45 degrees left of forward and 45 degrees up, with magnitude of the square root of the sum of the squares of each magnitude. If all magnitudes are the same, then it would be SQRT(3) x the magnitude of one of the vectors.

Angular momentum vectors can't cancel each other if they are perpendicular to each other. Some parallel and opposing components between two or more vectors is required.

A link for almost everything you might want to know about gyroscopes, as a series of videos of lectures.

http://www.gyroscopes.org/1974lecture.asp
 
Last edited:
Thank you everyone! Are we all agreed then that the resulting device would behave like a single gyroscope and will not resist motion in the X, Y& Z planes?
 
PH7SICS said:
Thank you everyone! Are we all agreed then that the resulting device would behave like a single gyroscope and will not resist motion in the X, Y& Z planes?

NOOO! We all agree that the new object will behave as a gyroscope!
No one said this: will not resist motion in the X, Y& Z planes.
As any gyroscope, it will not resist rotation motion whose axe is parallel to the resultant angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
lpfr said:
NOOO! We all agree that the new object will behave as a gyroscope!

Sorry, that is what I meant, the device would behave as a regular gyroscope ie a single gyroscope?
 
  • #10
Ouf! That's better!
 
  • #11
Thanks for THAT link jeff, I must have missed it before.
 
  • #12
lpfr said:
NOOO! We all agree that the new object will behave as a gyroscope!
No one said this: will not resist motion in the X, Y& Z planes.
As any gyroscope, it will not resist rotation motion whose axe is parallel to the resultant angular momentum.

Also, as any gyroscope, it will not resist any translational motion...
 
  • #13
vanesch said:
Also, as any gyroscope, it will not resist any translational motion...
Also, as any anything, it will not resist any translational motion...
 
  • #14
vanesch said:
Also, as any gyroscope, it will not resist any translational motion...
Better stated as: it will not resist any translatonal motion any different than any object with the same mass. It still has momentum relative to it's mass.
 
  • #15
Jeff Reid said:
Better stated as: it will not resist any translatonal motion any different than any object with the same mass. It still has momentum relative to it's mass.

Correct.

.
 
  • #16
If you have two Gyroscopes rotating on the same axis in opposite directions would it change the resistance?
 
  • #17
Rockmore said:
If you have two Gyroscopes rotating on the same axis in opposite directions would it change the resistance?

Then there is no net angular momentum, so it would not act as gyroscope.
 
  • #18
Rockmore said:
If you have two Gyroscopes rotating on the same axis in opposite directions would it change the resistance?
The external resitstance would be the same as zero angular velocity (not spinning) of the gyroscopes, but internally there would be large and opposing torques on the common axis between the 2 gyroscopes in reaction to any rotation component perpendicular to the axis. It would have to be a strong connection or else it would break.
 
  • #19
gyroscopes staying level

I want to make a gyroscope stabilizer for my video camera. If I make a gyroscope with a horizontal rotation using a small electric motor and start the gyroscope exactly level to the horizon will it remain level or will it begin to drift at some point?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K