Can a Bullet Shot from a Gun on a Moving Plane Exceed 1000km/h?

  • Thread starter Thread starter King_Stig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Judge Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of firing a bullet from a gun on a moving plane. One participant argues that the bullet will not leave the gun or will barely do so due to air resistance, while the other contends that the bullet will achieve a total speed of 2000 km/h when accounting for the plane's speed. The key point is that the bullet is already moving at 1000 km/h with the plane, so when fired, it adds to that speed. Air resistance will affect the bullet, but calculations suggest it won't significantly hinder its velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding relative velocity in this scenario.
King_Stig
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello. A friend of mine stated the following;

If you stand on top of a moving plane (v=1000km/h) and shoot a bullet from a gun (muzzle velocity under normal conditions = 1000km/h) in the same direction that the plane is moving. He claims that the bullet will not leave the gun or if it does only barely. This is because of the resistance in the air.

I on the other hand claim this is complete rubbish, and the bullet will attain a much higher speed than 1000km/h in total.

Will you please be the judges. 40$ at stake here ;)

Thx.

-Stig
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah the ol relative velocity problem! What makes me curious is why he thinks if it did pick up extra speed, that it would be marginal. Bullets can certainly go far beyond supersonic.

That's besides the point, however. The problem with how a lot of people see this situation is that they don't realize the bullet in the chamber is moving 1000km/h even if its sitting in your hand! It's a matter of what frame of reference you look at. Since this question is assumed that someone on the ground is watching the plane travel by at 1000km/h, the ground is the rest frame. When the bullet fires, the force of the explosion will act on the bullet the same amount and for the same duration as if you were standing on the ground. From the person on the plane holding the gun's point of view, he will see the bullet fire off at 1000km/h, but more importantly, the person on the ground will see it travel off at 2000km/h. Now of course, there is going to be more air resistance if you're in a plane and you fire the gun, but, as some elementary calculations will do, you can approximate the resistance to be proportional to the velocity of the bullet, thus it will only face twice the air resistance. Worst case scenario in this approximation, the bullet slows down twice as quickly as if fired on the ground... which is not much.

Here's something to think about. Fighter jets have always had machine guns and canons mounted to them and even though they surely had more power behind them, they didn't just limp out of the barrels.
 
Thank you for a great (and qiuck) reply.

Victory is mine. muhahaha.

-S
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top