Can a Function in Polar Coordinates Fail in Cartesian Coordinates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A function defined in polar coordinates, such as r(θ) = 1 + sin(θ), may not qualify as a function in Cartesian coordinates due to the failure of the vertical line test. This discrepancy arises because the representation of the same relationship can differ based on the coordinate system used. While polar coordinates can define a function with a unique r for each θ, the Cartesian representation may yield multiple y-values for a single x-value, thus violating the definition of a function. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately interpreting mathematical relationships across different coordinate systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their representation
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates and the vertical line test
  • Basic knowledge of functions and their definitions in mathematics
  • Ability to convert between polar and Cartesian coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conversion formulas between polar and Cartesian coordinates
  • Learn about the vertical line test and its implications for function definition
  • Explore examples of functions that behave differently in polar and Cartesian systems
  • Investigate the implications of coordinate systems in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students studying coordinate systems, as well as anyone interested in the properties of functions across different mathematical representations.

Undoubtedly0
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi all. What does it mean that a function in polar coordinates may not be a function in Cartesian coordinates?

For example, r(\theta) = 1 + \sin\theta is a function because each \theta corresponds to a single value of r. However, in Cartesian coordinates, the graph of this function most clearly fails the vertical line test.

Therefore, functionality depends on the coordinate system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the type of function you want.
  • If you want a function y(x), you cannot get the same graph as your equation gives.
  • You can find a function R->R2 with (x,y)(t), however, which gives one point (x,y) for each value of t, and has the same graph as your function.
  • You can find a function R2->R, f(x,y) where your graph corresponds to all points where f(x,y)=0.
  • ...
 
Undoubtedly0 said:
Therefore, functionality depends on the coordinate system?

I wouldn't call the property of being a function "functionality", but, yes, a set of ordered pairs representing certain information may be a function and when the same information is represented in a different way as a different set of ordered pairs, that other set of ordered pairs may fail to be a function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K