Can a graph with no self loops and odd common neighbors have an Eulerian path?

Click For Summary
A graph with no self-loops and an odd number of common neighbors between any two different vertices is being analyzed for the existence of an Eulerian path. The discussion highlights the challenge of proving that such a graph must have an odd number of vertices, which is crucial for establishing the conditions for an Eulerian path. The conversation references the seven bridges of Königsberg problem to illustrate the complexities involved. A key point raised is the necessity for all vertices to have even degrees to satisfy Eulerian path conditions. Ultimately, the original poster confirmed they solved the problem, indicating progress in understanding the graph's properties.
estro
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove that a graph with the below properties has an eulerian path.
1. Graph has no self loops or parallel edges.
2. Every two different vertices u and v have an odd number of common neighbor vertices.

I'm thinking about this problem for a whole day and can't manage to prove this. I think that I can prove it if I could prove that every graph with these properties must have odd number of vertices but I can't prove it as well.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As I read it, your conjecture is easily falsified by a trivial modification to the seven bridges of Königsberg problem. Using the word "odd" is rather odd as one of the conditions for an undirected graph to have an Eulerian cycle is that every vertex must have an even degree.
 
The number of common neighbor vertices is odd, however don't forget about not common vertices.
 
Looks like it will involve proving all vertices have even degree. So consider a vertex of odd degree. What can you say about its neighbours and the edges connecting them?
 
What, exactly, do you mean by "Every two different vertices u and v have an odd number of common neighbor vertices", and how does the bridges of Königsberg problem (which does not have an Eulerian path) not exhibit this behavior?
 
Hi estro,

Are you still interested in this? The hint I gave in post #4 does lead to the solution.
 
Hi Haruspex,

I already solved this problem, thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K