Can a nuclear reaction violate the first law of classical thermodynamics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Felgar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nuclear reactions do not violate the first law of classical thermodynamics; rather, they illustrate the need to unify the laws of conservation of mass and energy as established by Einstein's theory of relativity. Prior to this unification, classical thermodynamics treated mass and energy as separate entities, leading to apparent violations during nuclear processes. The relationship defined by E=mc² clarifies that mass-energy is conserved together, thus maintaining the integrity of thermodynamic laws when viewed through a modern lens.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Knowledge of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Basic concepts of nuclear reactions and radioactivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of E=mc² in nuclear physics
  • Study the differences between classical and modern thermodynamics
  • Explore the conservation laws in the context of relativistic physics
  • Examine case studies of nuclear reactions and their energy transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in thermodynamics, nuclear physicists, and anyone interested in the interplay between mass and energy in nuclear processes.

Felgar
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I'm in an argument with someone on another forum (car forum no less) and he refuses to accept that nuclear reactions break the first law of classical thermodynamics. I'm only trying to show him that before energy and mass were shown to be interchangeable, the laws of conservation energy and of conservation of mass is the classical sense are violated by nuclear/radioactive processes. However, it's so commonly accepted now that mass-energy is conserved together rather than separately, I can't find a valid and credible source that distinguishes between classical and more modern thermodynamics.

Can anyone help with a link? Thanks guys.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I am not aware of nuclear reactions breaking any laws of thermodynamics.
 
Just that taken separate from each other, the laws of conservation of mass and conservation of energy don't hold, because we'll lose mass in a nuclear reaction. Not until the revelation that e=mc^2 and the combination of the two laws do we actually get a conservation law that is not broken.

quoted from
Relativity, the Special and General Theory
by Dr. Einstein

"Before the advent of relativity, physics recognized two conservation laws of fundamental importance, namely the law of conservation of energy and the law of the conservation of mass; these laws appeared to be quite independent of each other.
By means of the theory of relativity they have been united into one law... "
 
You shouldn't see this as a violation of the 1st law of thermodynamics, you should rather consider that in the first law, energy can now (since Einstein) include what is available through E = mc^2 in the case where you have nuclear reactions.
 
Alrighty then... No wonder it was hard to find that reference. Heh.

And yeah, obviously that's what makes the most sense. But the argument was about the classical definition which I was arguing wuold have to be observed in the strictest sense. But yeah, whatever.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K