Can a powerful projectile electron drill through nucleus?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a high-energy electron projectile, such as a cosmic electron at 1TeV, penetrating a nucleus, akin to a bullet drilling through a cake. Participants explore the implications of quantum mechanics on this scenario, questioning the classical interpretations of particle interactions at the nuclear scale.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a high-energy electron could penetrate a nucleus, potentially deviating from its path due to the nucleus's structure.
  • Others argue that thinking of electrons and nucleons as classical particles is a misconception, emphasizing the quantum nature of interactions at this scale.
  • A participant suggests that if an electron were to hit the exact center of a nucleus, a detector positioned on the opposite side could potentially register the electron, referencing quantum tunneling.
  • Some participants express skepticism about visual representations of electron-nucleus interactions, suggesting they are oversimplified and do not accurately depict quantum behavior.
  • There is a contention regarding the idea of electrons "boring holes" through nucleons, with some participants asserting that this notion is unrealistic given the scale and nature of nuclear interactions.
  • One participant concludes that regardless of energy, an electron would either reflect or deflect around a nucleus rather than penetrate it, although this conclusion is challenged by others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the possibility of electrons penetrating nuclei and the implications of such interactions. There is no consensus on whether electrons can "drill" through nucleons or if they merely reflect or deflect upon interaction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding particle interactions, particularly the dependence on quantum mechanics and the challenges in visualizing and verifying theoretical predictions about nuclear structure.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying quantum mechanics, particle physics, or nuclear physics, particularly in understanding the complexities of particle interactions at the atomic level.

kiwaho
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
For example, a cosmic electron projectile at 1TeV, is it possible to fly through a nucleus just like a bullet drills through a cake and makes the cake insensible recoil?
After drill-trough, the electron may have some deviation from incident direction because the route may not exactly pass the center of nucleus.
If it is true, are there holes in some nucleons?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be thinking of electrons and nucleons as classical particles. This is a misconception and will not get you very far. Everything on the nuclear scale occurs in the realm of quantum physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Orodruin said:
You seem to be thinking of electrons and nucleons as classical particles. This is a misconception and will not get you very far. Everything on the nuclear scale occurs in the realm of quantum physics.
OK, let us think it quantumly: if a high energy projectile electron fly to the exact center of a nucleus, and a detector is located at other side of the said nucleus, just on the forward extension line of the electron movement, then can the detector receive the electron?
Supposedly the detector can see the electron pass over the barrier nucleus, because quantum physics recognizes a small particle can "tunnel" through a bigger particle although obstacle does exist. Many researchers study nucleus structure and obtain results by projecting electron to penetrate nucleus from different angles. I not mean the electron projectile to fly through the nearby space of nucleus, but to penetrate.
There is a assumption here: electron geometric size is far less than a nucleus.
 
Last edited:
kiwaho said:
OK, let us think it quantumly: if a high energy projectile electron fly to the exact center of a nucleus
This is a contradiction in terms.
 
In some publications, I see figures depicting electron projectile pass through nucleus, even a single proton.

For example:
guidedtour03.l.gif

It means high energy projectile can drill through nucleon, even damage or kill a nucleon to smaller fragment pieces.
 
At what point do you get the idea that these "pictures" are nothing more than a cartoon depiction to give a visual representation of what might happen?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
ZapperZ said:
At what point do you get the idea that these "pictures" are nothing more than a cartoon depiction to give a visual representation of what might happen?
This. It is worth it to also underline the fact that the representation of the nucleons are also only pictorial and have very little to do with what is actually going on. The nucleus is a quantum object as well and the quarks are not three small balls. At the quantum level, the world works very differently from what you are used to.
 
To my best understand on you guys replies, I conclude:
1. no credit to whatever cartoon-like figures, just always think in quantum physics.
2. no matter how energetic, the electron projectile can only reflect back, or say never pass through the barrier nucleus if it does hit a nucleus "face to face"; otherwise deflect around the nucleus if mishit.
 
kiwaho said:
To my best understand on you guys replies, I conclude:
1. no credit to whatever cartoon-like figures, just always think in quantum physics.
2. no matter how energetic, the electron projectile can only reflect back, or say never pass through the barrier nucleus if it does hit a nucleus "face to face"; otherwise deflect around the nucleus if mishit.

Your "conclusion" is wrong. No one here said that an electron can't pass through without deflection. But this does NOT mean that it has "bore a hole" through the nucleus! This is ridiculous to even consider, as if we can drill holes into a nucleus like Swiss cheese! A nucleus is too small to even be "seen" with the best instruments that we have. What are the odds of observing these holes that, presumably, are even smaller? It is one thing to predict it, it is another to VERIFY it.

The physics of particle collision/interaction is NOT as easy and simple as you think, or as what has been depicted in many pictures. It is why you only see cartoon pictures, rather than ACTUAL pictures.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kiwaho
  • #10
ZapperZ said:
Your "conclusion" is wrong. No one here said that an electron can't pass through without deflection. But this does NOT mean that it has "bore a hole" through the nucleus! This is ridiculous to even consider, as if we can drill holes into a nucleus like Swiss cheese! A nucleus is too small to even be "seen" with the best instruments that we have. What are the odds of observing these holes that, presumably, are even smaller? It is one thing to predict it, it is another to VERIFY it.

The physics of particle collision/interaction is NOT as easy and simple as you think, or as what has been depicted in many pictures. It is why you only see cartoon pictures, rather than ACTUAL pictures.

Zz.
Oh, I see now, thanks to Zz and Orodruin!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
14K