Can a Sterling Engine Generate Electricity in the Extreme Temperatures of Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Idiot101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engines Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using Stirling engines to generate electricity in the extreme temperatures of space. While Stirling engines can be more efficient than solar cells for spacecraft applications, they present significant drawbacks, including vibrations and reliance on fluids that introduce potential failure modes. Comparatively, turbines are identified as superior alternatives for energy generation in space environments. NASA-sponsored projects are exploring the use of Stirling engines in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) to convert heat into electricity, although thermocouples remain the current standard.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stirling engine mechanics
  • Familiarity with spacecraft energy systems
  • Knowledge of radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs)
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency of Stirling engines versus turbines in space applications
  • Explore NASA's projects involving Stirling engines and RTGs
  • Learn about the design and function of solar electricity generators for spacecraft
  • Investigate the impact of vibrations on spacecraft systems
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, energy systems researchers, and anyone interested in advanced power generation technologies for space exploration.

Idiot101
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The temp. difference in sunlight and shade in space is quite large and so my thoughts are can one run a sterling engine in space to produce electricity.. ? .. Any thoughts?.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling_engine

some videos of it on youtube as well...

cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A thermal engine would be far more efficient on a spacecraft than Solar cells.

It has drawbacks as well, especially as it gives vibrations to the spacecraft . Also, it relies on a fluid, which introduces failure modes.

As for Stirling engines, they have essentially drawbacks. A turbine is far better in any aspect.

Here a description of such a Solar electricity generator for spacecraft , including the Sunlight concentrator, the spillway, and other uses of a similar hardware to produce cold and store cryogenic propellants indefinitely:
http://saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2051
but you'll have to be logged into see the drawings, alas. Not my website, and the owner changed that recently.

Also, Nasa-sponsored projects want to use Stirling engines to convert heat from radioisotopes into electricity on spacecraft . Called an RTG, it uses thermocouples up to now; a thermal engine would be more efficient and save scarce Pu-238, but here again, a turbine is better.

Marc Schaefer, aka Enthalpy
 
Thank you very much... you have answered my question...

Best wishes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K