Can a thick pinhole create a spot smaller than the diffraction limit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Athiril
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A thick pinhole, such as a long solid cylinder with a fine hole, may project a spot smaller than the diffraction limit of a thin pinhole due to the elimination of oblique rays, focusing on-axis light. As the pinhole size decreases, diffraction effects increase, leading to light loss and a dimmer spot with limited distinguishable content. The discussion highlights the potential for quantum mechanical effects, such as plasmons, to enable the formation of images smaller than the diffraction limit when light interacts with conductive tube walls. These plasmons can carry the frequencies of incident waves and re-radiate energy as light at the tube's end. Overall, engineering the aperture and tube design could allow for imaging at nanoscale features beyond traditional limits.
Athiril
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Didn't seem to have much luck on the actual reasoning with this elsewhere.

A regular pinhole projects an image, and has a diffraction limit for the image, that is the size of the airy disk.

What if we take a thick pinhole, no a pinhole in metal foil for example, but a long solid cylinder, several cm (or longer if need be) thick, with a fine pinhole drilled through it.

Can this project a non-image very fine spot that is smaller than the diffraction limit of a thin pinhole of the same diameter?

Oblique rays are essentially cut out, and you're left with on-axis.


I know someone will bring up ripple simulations / diffraction waves, like water down a long hallway (or sewer), it'll bounce off the walls, interfere with itself and propagate forward, and spread out at the exit.



But there are some obvious differences that are usually more or less neglible in thin aperture ripple simulations.

What if the material absorbed the wave as it hits the material of the aperture. This only portion of the wave to make it out, would be the center portion propagating on a narrow enough angle to avoid hitting the material.


Any idea on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As the tube becomes longer and longer the cone of rays which can pass becomes smaller and smaller; thus the field of view is reduced, and the image becomes fainter and fainter due to loss of light.

As the hole becomes smaller and smaller the diffraction effects would increase, thus causing more light to be lost in the tube, diffracted onto the side (and absorbed, hopefully - this is why microscope tubes have special dark coatings on the inside, to get rid of the extraneous light).

Ultimately, as the hole size is reduced, all that you will see is a somewhat dim spot of light, with no distinguishable content beyond its intensity and spectrum.

As the hole becomes smaller yet, the longer wavelengths will not be able to propagate through the hole, and the spectrum will accordingly be shifted towards the shorter wavelengths.

If the walls of the tube are conductive, the incident light at the top, which is hitting the area around the hole, may induce quantum mechanical effects - in this case, plasmons, which are quantized waves of charge (= neutral plasma waves). These have can propagate along the interior edges of the tube due to their shorter wavelengths, and yet carry the frequencies of the incident waves along with them. This is possible because their speed of travel is much slower than light, hence the wavelengths fit.

At the opposite end of the tube the plasmons re-radiate a portion of their energy as light, and an image may be formed - if everything is just so - and thus it is possible to form an image smaller than the diffraction limit, and even focus it with specially engineered holes.
See, for example, "Imaging nanoscale features with plasmon-coupled leakage radiation from far-field radiation":

http://www.opticsinfobase.org/view_...20827.pdf?da=1&id=241011&seq=0&mobile=no&org=There has been a lot of work on this in the past few years; also see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superlens
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top