Can a TRIAC be used to reduce power consumtion for a charger?

  • Thread starter Thread starter U4edot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charger Power
AI Thread Summary
Using a TRIAC to reduce power consumption in a charger is theoretically possible, as it can control the current flow by delaying its turn-on time each half-cycle, thereby lowering the RMS voltage. However, this approach may lead to improper functioning of the charger due to insufficient input voltage. TRIACs operate by remaining ON until the AC current reverses, which occurs frequently, making them less effective for continuous power conservation in chargers. They are commonly used in household dimmer switches to adjust power delivery by changing the timing of the gating circuit. Overall, while TRIACs can throttle resistive loads for power conservation, their application in chargers may not be practical.
U4edot
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
If my understanding of triac's is correct then the triac will conduct current until the amperage flowing though it drops below the threshold. If that is true would adding a triac before the primary induction coil reduce power consumption?

If it did, how would the you reestablish the connection? Would it automatically reestablish itself after a wile, or would the circuit be broken forever?

Help please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After the applied voltage to a triac crosses zero, the triac remains OFF (non-conducting) until it is triggered with a pulse from a (passive) timing circuit. Once the triac is turned ON, it remains ON until the input voltage crosses zero again, which turns the triac OFF.

Delaying the triac turn-on each half-cycle reduces the rms voltage to the charger and reduce power consumption, but the charger may not work correctly due to lack of input voltage.
 
Last edited:
It makes sense now
Thanks a ton!
 
TRIAC's will kick off as soon as the amperage drops below the threshold, so whenever the AC current reverses direction the TRIAC will brake the circuit. This happens about 60 times per second. So using a TRIAC for power conservation is not such a good idea
 
Most hosehold incandescent lamp dimmer switches are just triacs with a manually adjustable gating circuit. When you adjust the dimmer you are just changing the delay in time between when ac voltage crosses zero and when the gating circuit turns on the forwardly biased half of the triac; the triac is like two inverse parallel SCRs with their gates tied together. It does this for both positive and negative halves of the sine wave. So, turning down a dimmer (increasing the triac gating delay) "conserves power" since less current flows to the lamp filiment for each half alternation. Triacs could easily be used at the power delivery end of an "intelligent", automatic, control system to throttle back resistive loads (water heater elements, resistive heating, incandescent lighting, etc) and thus conserve power. Not paying your electric bill for 3 months in a row is another way
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top