Can aluminum alter the B field in a dielectric?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of aluminum on the magnetic field (B field) in the context of a current-carrying wire wrapped in aluminum. Participants explore the role of surface currents, magnetic susceptibility, and the behavior of electron orbits in relation to the B field.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why materials like aluminum reduce the B field, suggesting that electron orbits might be affected, which could lead to a reduction of the B field inside the aluminum.
  • Another participant asserts that surface currents do exist in aluminum, challenging the initial assumption that only changing B fields can induce currents.
  • A participant references Faraday's law, stating that it requires a changing B field to produce a current, indicating a misunderstanding of the conditions under which currents can arise.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of reciprocity, explaining that a static magnetic field can induce currents through the alignment of microscopic loop currents in the material, which can lead to a net macroscopic loop current on the surface.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the clarification provided in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the existence of surface currents in aluminum and the conditions necessary for their induction. Some participants assert that surface currents can exist without a changing B field, while others maintain that only changing fields can induce currents.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of currents in materials and the role of magnetic susceptibility, which may not be fully explored or agreed upon by all participants.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Why do materials like aluminum cut down the value of the B field?
Like suppose we had an infinite current carrying wire wrapped with a cylinder of aluminum.
To find the B field we would use amperes law and the magnetic susceptibility of aluminum.
For example, when a superconductor is exposed to a static B field it creates surface currents to counter the B field and to make sure B is zero on the inside. But in the case of aluminum I don't think there are surface currents. And according to the Lorentz force a charged particle has to be moving to be affected by a static B field. So really the only thing that could be altered are the electron orbits. So are the electron orbits being affected and this in turn reduces the B field inside the aluminum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
...But in the case of aluminum I don't think there are surface currents...

You think wrong.
 
So there are surface currents, I thought it takes a changing B field to produce a current.
Faraday's law tells us we need a changing B field to induce a current.
 
cragar said:
So there are surface currents, I thought it takes a changing B field to produce a current.
Faraday's law tells us we need a changing B field to induce a current.

Well, don't forget reciprocity here. For example, we can make a magnetostatic field using a DC current (Biot-Savart Law). So obviously we do not need a time-varying magnetic field to induce a current. A rough classical idea for why physical currents arise is as follows: The bulk of your material is going to have randomly oriented microscopic loop currents (in terms of the classical picture they can be thought of as the electron orbitals). Randomly oriented there is no net magnetic field produced by these loop currents. However, an applied magentic field will align some of these loop currents in accordance to the material's permeability. This is akin to how an applied electric field induces electric dipole moments, the magnetic field induces magnetic dipole moments.

So the alignment of the magnetic dipoles means that these loop currents will align and we can think of them as flowing in the same direction. So loop currents that are adjacent will have cancellation and we can sum up the adjacent loop currents into a larger single loop current.

For example, see the attached image in this post: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2474064&postcount=69

The whole of it is that in the end, alignment of these microscopic currents creates a net macroscopic loop current that flows on the surface of the object.

As for what you stated in the OP, I guess the key point is that there is an assumption of existing currents in the material already.
 
thanks for your answer it cleared it up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K