Can an oscillator with infinite harmonics be excited at only one frequency?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zacman2400
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonics Resonance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of oscillators with infinite harmonics, specifically whether an oscillator can be excited at only one frequency and how this affects the presence and distribution of harmonics. Participants explore both electrical and mechanical oscillators, considering theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether driving an oscillator at a single frequency would result in only that frequency being present in the output, or if other harmonics would also be excited.
  • Others propose that the presence of harmonics may depend on the nature of the oscillator, with distinctions made between electrical and mechanical systems.
  • A participant suggests that nonlinearity in an electrical circuit could lead to the generation of harmonics, while another emphasizes that a simple LC circuit resonates at a defined frequency.
  • Concerns are raised about reconciling the frequency limits observed in practical systems, such as stoves, with theoretical models that suggest infinite harmonics.
  • One participant references the "ultraviolet catastrophe" as a historical example of classical physics failing to account for the observed limits in frequency distributions.
  • Discussion includes the idea that harmonics in mechanical systems arise from alternative modes of oscillation, while in electrical systems, additional modes may be necessary to produce harmonics.
  • Some participants mention practical applications of oscillators that produce complex waveforms, like square or sawtooth waves, which inherently contain multiple harmonics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a single frequency input can excite multiple harmonics in an oscillator. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the behavior of oscillators and the implications of nonlinearity.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of oscillators, the assumptions regarding linearity and nonlinearity, and the unresolved nature of how harmonics are generated in different systems.

zacman2400
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
If I have a oscillator that has an infinite number of harmonics, what decides which harmonics are excited? Is it whatever frequency inputs I drive into the system, and the system damps out frequencies that don't match the harmonics or is it possible that driving at only one harmonic frequency, every harmonic would be excited in the system? If this is the case how do the intensities distribute?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that you have an electrical oscillator that is outputting a signal that contains infinite harmonics, or are you describing something like a tuning fork and asserting that it has an infinite number of resonant frequencies?
 
something like an electrical oscillator..let me refine my question a little better. If I drive my electrical oscillator at a certain frequency continuously, my feeling is the output would reflect only that frequency and none of the harmonics. On the other hand, if I drove the oscillator at a certain frequency for a finite amount of time, and then looked at the system later on will there be an infinite number of harmonics present or will the harmonics present be band-limited somehow? I know that in a stove IR radiation might be set up as a standing wave, but if all the harmonics were present then my stove would contain uv, and x-rays, and gamma-rays, and that does not happen. I am trying to reconcile the frequency limit in the stove vs. the seeming lack of a frequency limit on say a string fixed at two ends.
 
Forgive me but how do you drive an electrical oscillator?
 
write the second order diff eq for an RLC circuit set it equal to a forcing function, the output will be the convolution of the RLC impulse response with the forcing function, I am looking at oscillators that have an infinite number of modes available to them, perhaps I am using the wrong terminology. I am not looking at systems with a single resonance mode available to them.
 
OK, but that is not an electrical oscillator.

You can drive an mechanical oscillator, but with an electrical one, you set up the circuit, switch on and it either oscillates or it doesn't.

Please be more precise in your question.
 
1/√(LC) defines the single frequency that a simple LC circuit will resonate at. If you include some non linearity in the circuit then you can obtain resonances with harmonics of the fundamental, I reckon.
 
zacman2400 said:
I am trying to reconcile the frequency limit in the stove vs. the seeming lack of a frequency limit on say a string fixed at two ends.

You are forgetting that simple mathematical models are not the same as reality. For example when the wavelength of the vibrations of the string is the same size as the diameter of the string, the model you learned about in "dynamics 101" doesn't make any sense.

It's easy to make an electrical oscillator that produces a square wave, or an approximate triangle (sawtooth) wave, both of which contain large numbers of harmonics. There are lots of practical applications of this.

Nonlinear mechanical systems can also have a wide variety of behavours, but often they are designed to suppress the effects rather than "enhance" them.
 
zacman2400 said:
I know that in a stove IR radiation might be set up as a standing wave, but if all the harmonics were present then my stove would contain uv, and x-rays, and gamma-rays, and that does not happen.

What you are asking about is actually a famous failure of classical physics that had a prominent role in the development of quantum mechanics. It was known as the "ultraviolet catastrophe" around the turn of the century. According to classical thermodynamics and electromagnetics there should be, as you suggested, an infinite number of standing wave frequencies in a black body, each with a certain portion of the total energy. The total predicted energy was infinite (look up Rayleigh-Jeans law).


The only place I have seen this come up in the electronics field is when we talk about thermal noise of -174dBm/Hz. On the surface this seems to imply that every circuit we build has an infinite amount of noise power if we take the frequency up to infinity. In reality, this -174dbm/Hz comes from classical thermodynamics and, thus, is only valid below ultraviolet. And, thankfully, we do not need electronics to function at ultraviolet frequencies.
Cheers
 
Last edited:
  • #10
In a mechanical system, the harmonics arise because of alternatives modes of oscillation. The fundamental frequency of a string fixed at the ends is with the string as one half wavelength: the only static points are the endpoints. For the first harmonic, the string is one wavelength; the centre is now an additional fixed point.
To get harmonics from electrical circuits you will need extra modes of oscillation. I've no idea whether that is/can be done. But you can certainly produce harmonics by post-processing the signal nonlinearly, e.g. put it through a rectifier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K