Amer
- 259
- 0
how to prove that for any real number in r (0,1) there exist a natural number n in N such that
rn > 1
rn > 1
The discussion centers on proving that for any real number \(r \in (0,1)\), there exists a natural number \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r^n > 1\). Participants clarify the notation and correct misunderstandings regarding the expression \(r^n\). A key point is the use of rational numbers between \(r\) and \(\frac{r}{2}\) to establish the proof. The conversation highlights the importance of clear mathematical notation to avoid confusion.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of real analysis, educators teaching mathematical proofs, and anyone interested in the properties of numbers and exponentiation.
Amer said:how to prove that for any real number in r (0,1) there exist a natural number n in N such that
rn > 1
I don't understand the question. What is "r (0,1)"? You want a number n such that m > 1? If you want a number > 1, why not take 2?Amer said:how to prove that for any real number in r (0,1) there exist a natural number n in N such that
rn > 1
Evgeny.Makarov said:I don't understand the question. What is "r (0,1)"? You want a number n such that m > 1? If you want a number > 1, why not take 2?
Prove that for any real number \(r \in (0,1)\) there exist a natural number \(n \in N\) such that \(r n > 1\)
Wow, talk about keming. It is true, I recently changed contact lenses and my vision went down a bit.CaptainBlack said:What you have taken to be an "m" is in fact "r n" but with no space so that in the default font it looks like m