Can Any Real Number in (0,1) Exceed 1 with a Natural Number Exponent?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for any real number \(r \in (0,1)\), there exists a natural number \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r^n > 1\). Participants clarify the notation and correct misunderstandings regarding the expression \(r^n\). A key point is the use of rational numbers between \(r\) and \(\frac{r}{2}\) to establish the proof. The conversation highlights the importance of clear mathematical notation to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with natural numbers and their notation
  • Basic knowledge of exponentiation
  • Concept of rational numbers and their density in real numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponentiation with real numbers
  • Explore proofs involving limits and convergence in real analysis
  • Learn about the density of rational numbers in the real number line
  • Investigate common notation issues in mathematical writing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, educators teaching mathematical proofs, and anyone interested in the properties of numbers and exponentiation.

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
how to prove that for any real number in r (0,1) there exist a natural number n in N such that
rn > 1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amer said:
how to prove that for any real number in r (0,1) there exist a natural number n in N such that
rn > 1

Since between any two real numbers there is a rational, let \(p/q, \ p,q \in \mathbb{N}\) be such that:

\[\frac{r}{2}<\frac{p}{q}<r\]

Then multiplying through by \(q\) we get:\[1\le {p}<rq\]

CB.
 
Amer said:
how to prove that for any real number in r (0,1) there exist a natural number n in N such that
rn > 1
I don't understand the question. What is "r (0,1)"? You want a number n such that m > 1? If you want a number > 1, why not take 2?
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
I don't understand the question. What is "r (0,1)"? You want a number n such that m > 1? If you want a number > 1, why not take 2?

It should read:

Prove that for any real number \(r \in (0,1)\) there exist a natural number \(n \in N\) such that \(r n > 1\)

What you have taken to be an "m" is in fact "r n" but with no space so that in the default font it looks like m

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
What you have taken to be an "m" is in fact "r n" but with no space so that in the default font it looks like m
Wow, talk about keming. It is true, I recently changed contact lenses and my vision went down a bit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 126 ·
5
Replies
126
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K